Back

Delirium and High Sedation Levels are Common in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 and Associated with Poor Long-Term Outcomes

Bucklin, A. A.; Ganglberger, W.; Tesh, R. A.; Quadri, S.; Ayub, M. A.; Maher, S. S.; Montoya, M. P.; Malik, P.; Alabsi, H. S.; Rosand, J.; Kimchi, E. Y.; Akeju, O.; Mukerji, S. S.; Wiener-Kronish, J.; Westover, M. B.

2024-12-19 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.12.17.24319167 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe investigated delirium prevalence and potential effects of long-term sedation in critically ill COVID-19 patients; to identify opportunities for improving sedation practices and delirium prevention. MethodsThis prospective, single-center, observational cohort study was conducted from April-June 2020. Adult COVID-19 patients were eligible if admitted to an ICU with mechanical ventilation/intravenous sedation; or a general care unit with brain monitoring due to altered mental status. Patients were evaluated daily until discharge using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU, and CAM-Severity. Cumulative doses of sedation and paralytic medications were recorded. At three months post-enrollment, cognition, mood, and quality of life were measured by the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale 10-item (CES-10), and EuroQol 5-Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L), respectively. Results67 patients were enrolled, with a mean (SD) age of 59 (12) years, 30 (45%) Hispanic, 43 (64%) developing acute respiratory distress syndrome, 55 (82%) mechanically ventilated (mean duration of 22.9 days), and 5 comatose for the entire study. Of the 62 patients assessed for delirium, 61 (98%) had delirium at least once, with a mean (SD) of 12.7 (13.0) days. >90% of patients received opioids, benzodiazepines, or propofol at least once; median (IQR) total dose of 37.4 (78.9) mg (fentanyl equivalents), 52.5 (813.3) mg (midazolam equivalents), and 46 (53) g (propofol), respectively. At follow-up, 40 (60%) patients were reached, while 16 (24%) were deceased/comfort measures. Patients showed reductions in cognition, mood, and quality of life with median (IQR) scores for TICS (0-41): 30 (26-33); CES-D-10 (0-30): 6 (4-12); EQ-5D-3L (1-3): 2 (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort). ConclusionCritically and acutely ill patients with COVID-19 early in the pandemic experienced a high rate of delirium and sedation. Large doses of sedatives may contribute to greater delirium burden during hospitalization, and lead to poor clinical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
7.9%
3
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.4%
7
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
12
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
13
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
27
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%