Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of near point-of-care GeneXpert testing for STIs in South Africa: leveraging current capacity to address high prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis
Lekodeba, N.; Snyman, K.; Nichols, B. E.; Jamieson, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundSouth Africa has high sexually transmitted infections (STIs) prevalence and currently implement syndromic management, which has limitations such as untreated asymptomatic infections and antibiotic misuse. Diagnostic tools, like GeneXpert may offer potential improvements. We evaluated costs, cost-effectiveness and budget impact of reallocating GeneXpert capacity for STIs testing. MethodsWe developed static analytical model using previously collected data. Over one-year time horizon from provider perspective, we compared costs reported in 2024 USD and outcomes of syndromic management and nine scenarios using near point-of-care GeneXpert testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis in various target groups, including symptomatic individuals, antenatal care (ANC) attendees and HIV testers (Adolescent girls and young women (AGWY), and adults). Univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess uncertainty of key parameters. ResultsCost per person treated and correctly treated ranged from $21-$29 (syndromic management) and $88-$579 in GeneXpert scenarios. Syndromic management cost the healthcare system an estimated $24 million, GeneXpert testing would cost substantially more: $207 million (symptomatic), $116 million (ANC attendees), $1.7 billion (HIV testers), and $310-$884 million for targeted/combined approaches involving ANC attendees, AGWY and symptomatic individuals, and increase number of cases correctly treated by over 3-fold. Of scenarios modelled, two were cost-effective: 1) AGYW HIV testers and adults with STI symptoms, and 2) adults (15-49 years) having either HIV test or STI symptoms, incremental cost per additional case correctly treated was $515 and $1,079, respectively. While they are cost-effective, they would cost $2.26 and $10.52 billion over 5-years, respectively, compared to $145 million in syndromic management. Cost of cartridge was most influential parameter in sensitivity analysis. ConclusionsPrioritizing symptomatic individuals, high-risk groups (i.e HIV testers), and cost-effective interventions can improve cases correctly treated but requires additional budget. These findings support the need for targeted strategies to optimise clinical and economic benefits of GeneXpert testing for STIs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The early-stage comprehensive costs of routine PrEP implementation and scale-up in Zambia 96%
- Evaluating the health impact, health-system costs and cost-effectiveness of using TrueNat on stool samples compared to usual care for the diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis in primary care settings: a modelling analysis 94%
- Economic evaluation of a cluster randomized, non-inferiority trial of differentiated service delivery models of HIV treatment in Zimbabwe 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating strategies to combat a major syphilis outbreak in Australia among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in remote and regional Australia through mathematical modelling 93%
- Potential Utility of C-reactive Protein for Tuberculosis Risk Stratification among Patients with Non-Meningitic Symptoms at HIV Diagnosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 92%
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 among HIV-infected and-uninfected individuals in South Africa, April 2020- March 2022 – data from sentinel surveillance 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation 93%
- Understanding the effects of Universal Test and Treat on longitudinal HIV care continuum outcomes among South African youth: a retrospective cohort study 93%
- Modelling cost-effectiveness of tenofovir for prevention of mother to child transmission of hepatitis B virus infection in South Africa 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Consensus for Integrating the Point-of-Care Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT) into Sexually Transmitted Infection Management Guidelines: Results from a Two-Round Modified Delphi Survey. 93%
- The rise and fall of the new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden: mathematical modelling study 92%
- Antimicrobial resistance and treatment failures in symptomatic and asymptomatic Mycoplasma genitalium infections in São Paulo, Brazil: Evidence from a cross-sectional study of sexual health clinic attendees 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strengthening health system’s capacity for pre-exposure Prophylaxis for adolescent girls and young women and adolescent boys and young men in South Africa (SHeS’Cap – PrEP): Protocol for a mixed methods study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 93%
- Cost savings in male circumcision post-operative care continuum in rural and urban South Africa: Evidence on the importance of initial counselling and daily SMS 93%
- Can routine antenatal data be used to assess HIV antiretroviral therapy coverage among pregnant women? Evaluating the validity of different data sources in the Western Cape, South Africa 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.