Back

A multi-level gene-diet interaction analysis of fish oil supplementation and 14 circulating polyunsaturated fatty acids-related traits identifies the FADS and GRP12 loci

Ihejirika, S. A.; Chiang, A. H.; Singh, A.; Stephen, E.; Chen, H.; Ye, K.

2024-12-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.12.12.24318956 medRxiv
Show abstract

Fish oil supplements (FOS) are known to alter circulating levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) among individuals but in a heterogeneous manner. These varied responses may result from unidentified gene-FOS interactions. To identify genetic factors that interact with FOS to alter the circulating levels of PUFAs, we performed a multi-level genome-wide interaction study (GWIS) of FOS on 14 plasma measurements in 200,060 unrelated European-ancestry individuals from the UK Biobank. From our single-variant tests, we identified genome-wide significant interacting SNPs (P < 5 x 10-8) in the FADS1-FADS2 gene cluster for total omega-3, omega-3%, docosapentaenoic acid (DHA), DHA% and the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. Among the interaction signals for omega-3%, the lead SNP, rs35473591 (C>CT, CT allele frequency = 0.34), had a lower association effect size in the FOS-taking group ({beta} = 0.35 for allele C) than that in the group without FOS ({beta} = 0.42). Likewise, the effect sizes of associations between FOS and omega-3% varied across the three genotype groups ({beta} = 0.45, 0.50, and 0.59, respectively, in C/C, C/CT, and CT/CT). Our gene-level aggregate and transcriptome-wide interaction analyses identified significant signals at two loci, around FADS1-FADS2 and GRP12. The contribution of genome-wide gene-FOS interactions to phenotypic variance was statistically significant in omega-3-related traits. This systemic gene-FOS GWIS contributes to our understanding of the genetic architecture of circulating PUFAs underlying FOS response and informs personalized dietary recommendations.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.