Back

Comparing DXA and MRI body composition measurements in cross-sectional and longitudinal cohorts

Basty, N.; Thanaj, M.; Whitcher, B.; Bell, J. D.; Thomas, E. L.

2024-12-13 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.12.12.24318943 medRxiv
Show abstract

In this study we assessed the accuracy of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluating body composition. Using data from 32,961 participants in the UK Biobank, including 1,928 re-scanned participants after about two and a half years, we examined cross-sectional and longitudinal agreements in DXA and MRI measurements within android and gynoid regions. Our results showed that DXA reliably captured fat measurements but overestimated lean mass compared to MRI, particularly in android regions for men (4.10 vs. 1.74 kg) and women (2.92 vs. 1.10 kg). Longitudinal MRI data revealed a 4-5% muscle and lean mass decrease, undetected by DXA, which showed lean mass increases in women at the follow-up visit. Although DXA is practical for population-level fat assessments, MRI remains the preferred method for detailed and precise longitudinal body composition analysis.

Published in Communications Medicine (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.