Integrating patient experiences of healthcare: a critical realist thematic analysis of peri-operative experiences
Meigh, N. J.; O'Callaghan, L. A.; Goldsworthy, A.; Allan, C.; Stokes, A.; Mickan, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe perioperative experience is central to how patients perceive and navigate their care. While existing research has explored broad themes, the nuanced interplay of emotional, psychological, and clinical dimensions remains underexamined. Building on a recent scoping review, this qualitative study sought to explore perioperative patient experiences in greater depth, investigating both pre-established themes and emergent insights. MethodsPatients were invited to share their perioperative journeys through semi-structured interviews, offering detailed accounts of their lived experiences. Using a Critical Realist approach, the study examined both observable factors and underlying mechanisms shaping these experiences. By integrating pre-established themes with participants narratives, the study constructed a comprehensive framework reflecting the complexity of patient-reported experiences. AnalysisFour central themes were identified: (1) psychological resilience as a central pillar for patient experience, (2) empowerment and information flow as drivers of patient experience, (3) personalised care as the foundation for patient-centred experience, and (4) integrated care and pain management as central to patient experience. Additionally, social influences and financial barriers emerged as factors shaping the broader context of these experiences, though they were less interconnected with the core themes. DiscussionThis study underscores the multifaceted nature of perioperative patient experiences, where emotional resilience, empowerment, and personalised care are deeply intertwined. These findings highlight the need for health systems and healthcare professionals to address emotional and contextual factors alongside clinical dimensions to improve the overall patient experience. ConclusionBy prioritising the exploration of patient-reported perioperative experiences, this study provides critical insights into the emotional, psychological, and clinical elements that shape care. The integration of these dimensions offers practical guidance for developing patient-centred approaches that align with individuals needs and expectations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 95%
- Pain Expectations, Experiences and Coping Strategies Used By Post-operative Patients: A Descriptive Phenomelogical Study 95%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 93%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 92%
- Perspectives of Researchers and Clinicians on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: An Interview Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 93%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 91%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers experiences of working on the frontline and views about support during COVID-19 and comparable pandemics: A rapid review and meta-synthesis 93%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 92%
- A System Dynamics Model for Effects of Workplace Violence and Clinician Burnout on Agitation Management in the Emergency Department 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.