Reimagining the serocatalytic model for infectious diseases: a case study of common coronaviruses
Larsen, S. L.; Yang, J.; Lv, H.; Huan, Y. W.; Teo, Q.; Pholcharee, T.; Lei, R.; Gopal, A. B.; Shao, E. K.; Talmage, L.; Mok, C. K. P.; Takahashi, S.; Kraay, A.; Wu, N. C.; Martinez, P. P.
Show abstract
Despite the increased availability of serological data, understanding serodynamics remains challenging. Serocatalytic models, which describe the rate of seroconversion (gain of antibodies) and serore-version (loss of antibodies) within a population, have traditionally been fit to cross-sectional serological data to capture long-term transmission dynamics. However, a key limitation is their binary assumption on serological status, ignoring heterogeneity in optical density levels, antibody titers, and/or exposure history. Here, we implemented Gaussian mixture models - an established statistical tool - to cross-sectional data in order to characterize serological diversity of seasonal human coronaviruses (sHCoVs) throughout the lifespan. These methods identified four (NL63, 229E, OC43) to five (HKU1) distinct seropositive levels, suggesting that among seropositive individuals, the number of prior exposures or response to infection may vary. For each sHCoV, we fit adapted, multi-compartment serocatalytic models across 10 scenarios with different assumptions on exposure history and waning of antibodies. The best fit model for each sHCoV was always one that accounted for a gradient of seropositivity as well as host variation in the scale of serological response to infection. These models allowed us to estimate the strength and frequency of serological responses across sHCoVs, finding that the time for a seronegative individual to become seropositive ranges from 2.33-4.07 years across sHCoVs, and most individuals mount a strong antibody response reflected in high optical density values, skipping lower levels of seropositivity. We also find that despite frequent infection and strong serological responses, it is rare for an individual to remain seropositive throughout the lifetime. Crucially, our reimagined serocatalytic methods can be flexibly adapted across pathogens, having the potential to be broadly applied beyond this work.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying individual-level heterogeneity in infectiousness and susceptibility through household studies 95%
- The utility of whole-genome sequencing to identify likely transmission pairs for pathogens with slow and variable evolution 94%
- Predicting the impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention on short- and medium-term dynamics of enterovirus D68 in the US 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting antibody kinetics and duration of protection against SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination from sparse serological data 95%
- The interplay between vaccination and social distancing strategies affects COVID19 population-level outcomes 95%
- Genome-wide association study between SARS-CoV-2 single nucleotide polymorphisms and virus copies during infections 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying prevalence and risk factors of HIV multiple infection in Uganda from population-based deep-sequence data 95%
- Lineage frequency time series reveal elevated levels of genetic drift in SARS-CoV-2 transmission in England 95%
- Healthy dynamics of CD4 T cells may drive HIV resurgence in perinatally-infected infants on antiretroviral therapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.