Back

Investing in Open Science: Key Considerations for Funders

Cobb-Lewis, D. E.; Snyder, D.; Dumanis, S.; Thibault, R.; Marebwa, B.; Clark, E.; St.Clair, L.; Kirsch, L.; Durborow, M.; Riley, E. A. U.

2024-12-10 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2024.12.09.627554 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The open science movement aims to transform the research landscape by promoting research transparency in order to enable reproducibility and replicability, lower the barriers for collaboration, and reduce unnecessary duplication. Recently, in recognition of the value of open science, funding agencies have begun to mandate open science policies as a condition in grantee awards. However, operationalization and implementation of an open science policy can have unanticipated costs and logistical barriers, which can impact both the funder, as well as the grantee. These factors should be considered when implementing an open science policy. The Aligning Science Across Parkinsons (ASAP) initiative utilizes a comprehensive open science policy, which, in addition to requiring immediate free online access to all publications, also requires all newly-generated datasets, protocols, code, and key lab materials be shared by the time of publication. Moreover, preprints must be posted to a preprint repository by the time of manuscript submission to a journal for review. Here, we outline the potential costs associated with implementing and enforcing this open science policy. We recommend that funders take these considerations into account when investing in open science policies within the biomedical research ecosystem.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.1%
7
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
8
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
12
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
13
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
14
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
15
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
20
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%