MedTech innovation identification: A rapid scoping review of patent research studies to inform horizon scanning methods.
Garcia Gonzalez-Moral, S.; Pennock, E.; Ewedairo, O.; Green, E.; Elgey, J.; Mkwashi, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis study investigates the role of and methods for patent analysis in advancing medical technology (MedTech) innovation, a sector characterized by diverse, non-pharmacological or non-immunological healthcare technologies and significant research investment. Patents are critical early indicators of innovation, supporting horizon scanning and weak signal detection. The study aimed to identify intellectual property sources, evaluate methods for patent retrieval and analysis, and outline objectives for using patent data to anticipate trends and inform healthcare strategies. It also offered a methodological framework to support stakeholders in adopting innovative MedTech solutions. MethodsA rapid review (RR) was conducted using Cochrane Rapid Review Methods and PRISMA guidelines, with a pre-registered protocol on the Open Science Framework. Searches in Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science targeted records from 2020 onwards. Three independent reviewers screened studies using Rayyan. We included any study type, published since 2020 that provided sufficient data on patent sources, methods and tools applied to the study of MedTech. Our data extraction included bibliographic details, study characteristics, and methodological information. Risk of bias assessments were not undertaken. Narrative and tabular methods, supplemented by visual charts, were employed to synthesise findings. ResultsOur searches identified 1,741 studies, of which 124 were included after title, abstract, and full-text screening, with 54% being original research, 44% reviews, and the remainder being conference abstracts. Most studies (68%) relied solely on patent databases, while others searched the grey literature. Research objectives of the included studies were grouped into nine themes, with trend analysis (50%) and policy recommendations (20%) being the most common. The review analysed 199 patent databases, with 27% of studies using multiple sources. Time horizons for patent searches averaged 24.6 years, ranging from 1900 to 2019. Automated approaches, employed in 33% of studies, frequently utilised tools like Gephi for network visualization. Disease mapping, based on NICE classification, indicated that cancer (19%) and respiratory conditions (16%), particularly COVID-19, were key areas, while digital health dominated the "health and social care delivery" category. ConclusionsThe review highlights the value of patent data in trend analysis and its broader role in shaping policies and research strategies. While patents provide crucial insights into emerging technologies, inconsistent de-duplication practices across studies pose a risk of data inflation, accentuating the need for transparency and rigour. Finally, this review emphasized the importance of data transformation and visualization in detecting emerging trends with Python and R being the most commonly used programming languages for developing custom tools.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
- Introducing the EMPIRE Index: A novel, value-based metric framework to measure the impact of medical publications 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data 92%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the sensitivity, accuracy and currency of the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register for supporting rapid evidence synthesis production 93%
- Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: a scoping review 93%
- Development of the Individual Participant Data (IPD) Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials using individual participant data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 92%
- Network Graph Representation of COVID-19 Scientific Publications to Aid Knowledge Discovery 91%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.