Back

Leveraging DNA methylation to create Epigenetic Biomarker Proxies that inform clinical care: A new framework for Precision Medicine

Carreras Gallo, N.; Chen, Q.; Balague Dobon, L.; Aparicio, A.; Giosan, I. M.; Dargham, R.; Phelps, D.; Guo, T.; Mendez, K. M.; Chen, Y.; Carangan, A.; Vempaty, S.; Hassouneh, S.; McGeachie, M.; Mendez, T.; Comite, F.; Suhre, K.; Smith, R.; Dwaraka, V. B.; Lasky Su, J. A.

2024-12-08 health informatics
10.1101/2024.12.06.24318612
Show abstract

The lack of accurate, cost-effective, and clinically relevant biomarkers remains a major barrier to incorporating omic data into clinical practice. Previous studies have shown that DNA methylation algorithms have utility as surrogate measures for selected proteins and metabolites. We expand upon this work by creating DNAm surrogates, termed epigenetic biomarker proxies (EBPs), across clinical laboratories, the metabolome, and the proteome. After screening >2,500 biomarkers, we trained and tested 1,694 EBP models and assessed their incident relationship with 12 chronic diseases and mortality, followed up to 15 years. We observe broad clinical relevance: 1) there are 1,292 and 4,863 FDR significant incident and prevalent associations, respectively; 2) most of these associations are replicated when looking at the lab-based counterpart, and > 62% of the shared associations have higher odds and hazard ratios to disease outcomes than their respective observed measurements; 3) EBPs of current clinical biochemistries detect deviations from normal with high sensitivity and specificity. Longitudinal EBPs also demonstrate significant changes corresponding to the changes observed in lab-based counterparts. Using two cohorts and > 30,000 individuals, we found that EBPs validate across healthy and sick populations. While further study is needed, these findings highlight the potential of implementing EBPs in a simple, low-cost, high-yield framework that benefits clinical medicine.

Matching journals

1
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 2%
6.6× avg
2
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 10%
2.4× avg
3
Genome Biology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
#1
127× avg
4
iScience
Elsevier BV · based on 74 published papers
Top 0.5%
19× avg
5
Nature Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 88 published papers
Top 2%
6.2× avg
6
Cell Genomics
Elsevier BV · based on 34 published papers
Top 0.5%
27× avg
7
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 4%
7.1× avg
8
Science Translational Medicine
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) · based on 40 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
9
Cell Reports Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 49 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg
10
JAMIA Open
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 35 published papers
Top 3%
10× avg
11
Communications Biology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 0.6%
16× avg
12
eBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 82 published papers
Top 0.9%
10× avg
13
Bioinformatics
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 24 published papers
Top 0.5%
32× avg
14
Science Advances
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) · based on 52 published papers
Top 0.8%
13× avg
15
Advanced Science
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.5%
22× avg
16
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 37 published papers
Top 3%
6.5× avg
17
Nature Genetics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 72 published papers
Top 6%
3.3× avg
18
BMC Medical Genomics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.3%
26× avg
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 17 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
20
Gut Microbes
Informa UK Limited · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
21
PLOS Computational Biology
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 141 published papers
Top 9%
1.6× avg
22
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 94%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 53 published papers
Top 6%
2.0× avg
24
Communications Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 63 published papers
Top 3%
4.7× avg
25
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
7.7× avg
26
Genome Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 56 published papers
Top 7%
2.2× avg