CBAM-ResNet34-based classification and evaluation method for developmental processes of greenhouse strawberries
Wang, J.; Liang, Z.; Jiang, F.; Feng, J.; Xiao, Y.; Yang, M.; Wang, D.; Liang, C.
Show abstract
Strawberries, known for their economic significance and rich nutritional value, are cultivated extensively worldwide. However, a host of workers need to be employed every year to identify and categorize the developmental stages of the strawberries in the greenhouses, which is not only time-consuming, inefficient, increasing the cultivation cost, but also difficult to guarantee the classification accuracy. Meanwhile, affected by the complicated background, occlusions, and color interference, the features of strawberries are proven challenging to be extracted via the traditional neural networks due to serious gradient disappearance. Therefore, an improved CBAM-ResNet34- based classification evaluation method for developmental processes of greenhouse strawberries is investigated. The procedure of this method is as follows: firstly, the developmental stages of greenhouse strawberries are classified by experts into four stages: Stage I (initial stage), Stage II (green and white fruit stage), Stage III (early ripening stage), and Stage IV (fully ripe stage). The 627, 640, 604, and 340 strawberry images for these four stages are captured. Subsequently, the images are divided into training, validation, as well as testing sets and then undergo image pre- processing, expansion, and augmentation. Whereafter, the 7x7 convolution kernel in the first layer of the network is replaced by three consecutive 3x3 convolution cores to eliminate the redundant weights and unnecessary model parameters, and the BasicBlocks configuration is adjusted. Finally, the CBAM attention mechanism is added to each BasicBlock so as to pinpoint the spatial position of the strawberries and extract their major features such as shape, size, and color. Comparison experiments with the conventional deep neural networks LeNet5, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, ResNet34, and every improved part of CBAM-ResNet34 demonstrated that when the learning rate is 0.001, the Dropout rate is 0.3, and the Adams weight decay parameter is 0.001, the accuracies for validation and testing sets can reach to 92.36% and 87.56% with F1 scores of 0.92, 0.87, 0.85 and 0.88.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Stomata Classification and Detection System in Microscope Images of Maize Cultivars 96%
- A Machine Learning Model of Microscopic Agglutination Test for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis 96%
- An overview of GabRat edge disruption and its new extensions for unbiased quantification of disruptive camouflaging patterns using randomization technique 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analysis of machine learning and evolutionary optimization algorithms for precision tissue culture of Cannabis sativa: Prediction and validation of in vitro shoot growth and development based on the optimization of light and carbohydrate sources 94%
- SeedExtractor: an open-source GUI for seed image analysis 93%
- Self-Supervised Maize Kernel Classification and Segmentation for Embryo Identification 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- SegVeg: Segmenting RGB images into green and senescent vegetation by combining deep and shallow methods 95%
- GenoDrawing: An autoencoder framework for image prediction from SNP markers 94%
- High-throughput Phenotyping of Soybean Biomass: Conventional Trait Estimation and Novel Latent Feature Extraction Using UAV Remote Sensing and Deep Learning Models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- YieldNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Simultaneous Corn and Soybean Yield Prediction Based on Remote Sensing Data 96%
- A Robust Spike Sorting Method based on the Joint Optimization of Linear Discrimination Analysis and Density Peaks 94%
- A novel interpretable deep transfer learning combining diverse learnable parameters for improved T2D prediction based on single-cell gene regulatory networks 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.