Back

paramix : An R package for parameter discretisation in compartmental models, with application to calculating years of life lost

Goodfellow, L.; Pearson, C. A.; Procter, S. R.

2024-12-05 public and global health
10.1101/2024.12.03.24318412 medRxiv
Show abstract

Compartmental infectious disease models are used to calculate disease transmission, estimate underlying rates, forecast future burden, and compare benefits across intervention scenarios. These models aggregate individuals into compartments, often stratified by characteristics to represent groups that might be intervention targets or otherwise of particular concern. Ideally, model calculation could occur at the most demanding resolution for the overall analysis, but this may be infeasible due to availability of computational resources or empirical data. Instead, detailed population age-structure might be consolidated into broad categories such as children, working-age adults, and seniors. Researchers must then discretise key epidemic parameters, like the infection-fatality ratio, for these lower resolution groups. After estimating outcomes for those crude groups, follow on analyses, such as calculating years of life lost (YLLs), may need to distribute or weight those low-resolution outcomes back to the high resolution. The specific calculation for these aggregation and disaggregation steps can substantially influence outcomes. To assist researchers with these tasks, we developed paramix, an R package which simplifies the transformations between high and low resolution. We demonstrate applying paramix to a common discretisation analysis: using age structured models for health economic calculations comparing YLLs. We compare how estimates vary between paramix and several alternatives for an archetypal model, including comparison to a high resolution benchmark. We consistently found that paramix yielded the most similar estimates to the high-resolution model, for the same computational burden of low-resolution models. In our illustrative analysis, the non-paramix methods estimated up to twice as many YLLs averted as the paramix approach, which would likely lead to a similarly large impact on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios used in economic evaluations. Author summaryResearchers use infectious disease models to understand trends in disease spread, including predicting future infections under different interventions. Constraints like data availability and numerical complexity drive researchers to group individuals into broad categories; for example, all working age adults might be represented as a single set of model compartments. Key epidemic parameters can vary widely across such groups. Additionally, model outcomes calculated using these broad categories often need to be disaggregated to a high resolution, for example a precise age at death for calculating years life lost, a key measure when estimating the cost-effectiveness of interventions. To satisfy these needs, we present a software package, paramix, which provides tools to move between high and low resolution data. In this paper, we demonstrate the capabilities of paramix by comparing various methods of calculating deaths and years of life lost across broad age groups. For an analysis of an archetypal model, we find paramix best matches a high-resolution model, while the alternatives are substantially different.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
60.6%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
3
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
5
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
7
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
10
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
12
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
16
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
18
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%