Global Cancer Burden Attributable to Dietary Risks: Trends, Regional Disparities, and Future Projections (1990-2050)
Liang, J.; Lin, Y.; Zishan, H.; Ni, J.; Lin, H.; Cai, Y.; Qi, J.; Yao, L.; Yang, L.; Lin, D.; Guo, Z.; Yin, W.; He, J.
Show abstract
Cancer remains a leading global cause of death, with its burden increasingly shaped by demographic shifts and dietary factors. This study utilized the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database to evaluate cancer burdens attributable to dietary risks from 1990 to 2021, accounting for differences by age, gender, region, and socioeconomic level, and projected trends through 2050 using a Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort model. The global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributable to dietary risks declined from 302.48 to 189.62 per 100,000 population (AAPC: -1.49%) over three decades, yet disparities remain prominent across Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) regions. High-SDI countries, such as Luxembourg, achieved substantial reductions, while low-SDI nations like Lesotho and Zimbabwe experienced rising burdens, driven by inadequate dietary quality and limited health resources. Key dietary risks, including low intake of whole grains, milk, and red meat, demonstrated improvement in high-income countries but worsening trends in many low- and middle-income regions. Projections suggest a continued global decline in cancer burden attributable to dietary factors by 2050, with high-income regions benefiting most, while Latin America, the Caribbean, North Africa, and the Middle East may experience slower progress or transient increases. Additionally, the burden of poor dietary practices is expected to rise sharply among individuals aged 75 years and older, underscoring the compounding effects of aging populations. These findings highlight the urgent need for culturally tailored dietary interventions and evidence-based policies to address disparities, reduce cancer burdens, and improve outcomes for vulnerable populations globally.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for eight common cancers revealed from a phenome-wide Mendelian randomisation analysis of 378,142 cases and 485,715 controls 92%
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction 91%
- Amino acid variability, tradeoffs and optimality in human diet 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer incidence and mortality estimates in Arab countries in 2018: A GLOBOCAN data analysis 92%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 90%
- Site-specific cancer incidence by race and immigration status in Canada 2006-2015: a population-based data linkage study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of Second Primary Cancers After a Diagnosis of First Primary Cancer: A Pan-Cancer Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Study 91%
- Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study 90%
- Lifestyles and their relative contribution to biological aging across multiple organ systems: change analysis from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of plasma omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids with overall and 19 site-specific cancers: a population-based cohort study in UK Biobank 92%
- Developing and validating polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer risk prediction in East Asians 91%
- Methylation scores for smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index and risk of seven types of cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Area-based socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality in Germany – widening, narrowing or reversing inequalities between 2003 and 2019? 93%
- Increased adiposity is protective for breast and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study using up to 132,413 breast cancer cases and 85,907 prostate cancer cases. 91%
- Modifiable lifestyle factors and genetic risk of obesity in Indians 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.