Do Researchers Consider the Inter-relationship Between Time to Assessment and Admission Severity in Acute Stroke?
Lu, Z.; Gittins, M.; Kishore, A. K.; Smith, C. J.; Vail, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundStroke severity, often quantified by NIHSS at admission, evolves and may influence patients time to hospital arrival. The inclusion of timing in stroke severity assessment remains unclear in stroke research. Oversight of time to assessment can affect prognostic model interpretation, acute clinical decision-making, and the design of future clinical trials by considering admission severity in the context of time since symptom onset. AimsThis study aimed to assess whether and, if so, how stroke researchers account for time from symptom onset to admission severity assessment in their analyses. We sought to compare this with approaches used by perinatal researchers, considering a similar statistical relationship between gestational age and birth weight. Summary of reviewTwo reviewers systematically reviewed papers in leading specialty journals published in 2019 using NIHSS at admission and birth weight respectively as an explanatory factor in the statistical analysis. We targeted a minimum of 50 articles from each field to ensure 90% to identify approaches used in 5% or more of studies. A total of 111 studies were included. Perinatal researchers considered the temporal variable gestational age more often than time to assessment in stroke studies (89% vs. 7%, chi-squared p<0.001). It was consequently included more often (56% vs. 5%, chi-squared p<0.001). Four methods, including stratification, distribution, regression and combined approaches, were found. Time to assessment was only included as a continuous (n=2) or categorical (n=1) factor alongside admission NIHSS in three studies. Methods for covariate selection, essential for the interpretation of statistical models, were rarely specified. ConclusionsFew researchers explore the inter-relationship between baseline severity and time to assessment in stroke prognostication, in sharp contrast to consideration of timing in perinatal studies. Future research will investigate whether time to assessment or serial NIHSS in the hyper-acute phase could benefit both clinical practice and stroke research.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum fibrinogen level and fibrinogen administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Admission of Acute Stroke patients in Bangladesh 93%
- Confounding adjustment performance of ordinal analysis methods in stroke studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 92%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 91%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- CT-Perfusion absolute Ghost Infarct Core is a rare phenomenon associated with poor collateral status in acute ischemic stroke patients 91%
- A Call For Better Methodological Quality Of Reviews On Using Artificial Intelligence For COVID-19 Detection In Medical Imaging – An Umbrella Systematic Review 90%
- Upper limb functional recovery in chronic stroke patients after COVID-19-interrupted rehabilitation: An observational study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Trends in Native Americans With Ischemic Stroke - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 92%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 92%
- High fibrinogen-prealbumin ratio (FPR) predicts stroke-associated pneumonia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Title: Risk factors for severe disease in patients admitted with COVID-19 to a hospital in London, England: a retrospective cohort study 88%
- Covid-19 and excess mortality rates not comparable across countries 88%
- Excess respiratory, circulatory, neoplasm and other mortality rates during the Covid-19 pandemic in the EU and their implications 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.