Research opportunities in precision oncology: Perspectives on biospecimen and genomic data sharing from adults with cancer in Ireland
O'Grady, S.; Ralston, J. C.; McKiernan, E.; Drummond, F. J.; Rynne, J.; Mitchell, D.; Gallagher, W. M.; Drury, A.; Kolch, W.
Show abstract
Although surveys of people living with cancer in other nations have generally found a high degree of willingness to donate to research services such as genomic databases and biobanks, these results can vary from country to country. Additional questions also remain surrounding issues such as preferred model of consent, reporting of findings and concerns surrounding potential commercial application of health data. To address some of these gaps in our current knowledge, we collected responses from 176 people living with and beyond cancer in Ireland over a 16-month period. Twenty-eight percent of our survey respondents had previously donated a biological sample to research, with the majority indicating that they did so for altruistic reasons. We found that the vast majority of those who had not previously donated samples would do so if given the opportunity, suggesting that there is a significant untapped pool of potential sample donors, and increased efforts by researchers and clinicians to recruit these individuals, in an ethically acceptable way, could yield a substantial improvement in the availability of biological samples and data for research. There was also a strong preference among respondents for total transparency with personal health data, with the vast majority wanting to know of any risk factors identified in their genome, even if these risks were not medically actionable. A strong level of trust in both the clinical and scientific community was also observed in the responses, with most indicating that this played a major role in influencing their decision to donate. Finally, we found that although most respondents did not have issues with the involvement of a commercial entity in the donation process, there was still a sizeable percentage (26%) who did have some reservations.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive cancer-oriented biobanking resource of human samples for studies of post-zygotic genetic variation involved in cancer predisposition 94%
- Factors Influencing Precision Medicine Knowledge and Attitudes 92%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Re-contacting biobank participants: lessons from a pilot study within FinnGen 91%
- Opt-out policies capacity to increase organ donors is limited 91%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 90%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: A longitudinal household cross-sectional study 90%
- Sociodemographic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance studies with diverse recruitment strategies, Canada, 2020 to 2023 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 92%
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 90%
- Detecting PI3K and TP53 Pathway Disruptions in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Among Hispanic/Latino Patients 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- biobank.cy: The Biobank of Cyprus past, present and future 92%
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 90%
- Impact of a natural disaster on access to care and biopsychosocial outcomes among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.