Back

Hematocrit and Progressive Stroke in Single Small Subcortical Infarction: Insights from the China Stroke Registry III

Lu, J.; Hankey, G. J.; Zhang, X.; Meng, X.; Zeng, W.; Jiang, J.; Wang, A.; Tan, Z.

2024-11-29 neurology
10.1101/2024.11.26.24318033 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeSingle Small Subcortical Infarction (SSSI) is a subtype of ischemic stroke with unique pathophysiology, often leading to poor outcomes. This study investigates the association between admission hematocrit (HCT) levels and the risk of progressive stroke in SSSI patients. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the China National Stroke Registry III, including 2,457 SSSI patients. Progressive stroke was defined as an increase in the NIHSS score by [&ge;]2 points during hospitalization. Logistic regression models assessed the association between HCT levels and progressive stroke risk. ResultsAmong 2,457 SSSI patients, 135 (5.50%) experienced progressive stroke. Higher HCT levels were independently associated with a lower risk of progressive stroke (adjusted OR 0.983, 95% CI 0.973-0.994, P = 0.002), with a potential dose-response relationship. The protective effect was more pronounced in patients with severe sensory deficits (P for interaction = 0.013) and younger age (<65 years) (P for interaction = 0.037). Lower HCT levels were also independently associated with increased mortality risk within 3 months after stroke (adjusted OR 0.937, 95% CI 0.892-0.984, P < 0.001). ConclusionsHigher admission HCT levels are associated with a lower risk of progressive stroke in SSSI patients, particularly those with severe sensory deficits and younger age. Lower HCT levels may also increase early mortality risk. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring and optimizing HCT levels in SSSI management. Further research should explore the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.