Back

TimeFlies: an snRNA-seq aging clock for the fruit fly head sheds light on sex-biased aging

Tennant, N.; Pavuluri, A.; O'Connor-Giles, K. M.; Singh, G.; Larschan, E.; Singh, R.

2025-01-16 genomics
10.1101/2024.11.25.625273 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although multiple high-performing epigenetic aging clocks exist, few are based directly on gene expression. Such transcriptomic aging clocks allow us to identify potential age-associated genes directly. However, most existing transcriptomic clocks model a subset of genes and are limited in their ability to predict novel biomarkers. With the growing application of single-cell sequencing, there is a need for robust single-cell transcriptomic aging clocks. Moreover, aging clocks have yet to be applied to investigate the elusive phenomenon of sex differences in aging. We introduce TimeFlies, a pan-cell-type snRNA-seq aging clock for the Drosophila melanogaster head. TimeFlies uses deep learning to classify the donor age of cells based on genome-wide gene expression profiles. Using explainability methods, we identified key marker genes contributing to the classification, with lncRNAs showing up as highly enriched among predicted biomarkers. lncRNA:roX1 and lncRNA:roX2 are top clock genes across cell types. Both are regulators of X chromosome dosage compensation, a pathway previously found to be significantly affected by aging in the mouse brain. We validated these findings experimentally in Drosophila, showing a decrease in survival when dosage compensation is inhibited in vivo. Furthermore, we trained sex-specific TimeFlies clocks and noted significant differences in model predictions and explanations between male and female clocks, suggesting that different pathways drive aging in males and females.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.5%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
4
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
16
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
17
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
25
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%