Back

A single center cross-sectional study on the efficacy of low-dose cytarabine and aclramycin combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG regimen) in elder adults with acute myeloid leukemia

Xu, M.; He, C.; Wen, X.; Lan, C.; Li, X.; Hong, Y.; Li, X.

2024-11-19 hematology
10.1101/2024.11.18.24317527 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNowadays, the combination of CAG regimen with targeted therapy and immunotherapy has greatly improved the prognosis of AML patients, but there are controversies about the prognostic factors of CAG regimen alone, especially in AML elders. ObjectiveBy investigating the survival status of elder patients who received induction CAG regimen in our hospital at the beginning of this century and analyzing the factors affecting survival, we aim to provide scientific evidence for improving the survival of current patients. MethodThe AML elder patients treated with induction CAG regimen including low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 per 12 hours, day 1 to 14), aclarubicin(14 mg/m 2 per day, day 1 to 4), and G-CSF priming (200 ug / m2 per day, day 1 to 14) in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2001 to December 2009 were involved in this research. ResultsAmong 92 elderly AML patients, 44 (47.8%) showed clinical efficacy, while 48 (52.2%) experienced treatment failure (including 12 deaths (13.0%)). The main adverse reactions of chemotherapy were bone marrow suppression, with mild non hematological adverse reactions. The median recurrence time was 7 months. The risk factors related efficacy were high blasts, elevated LDH and HBDH. ConclusionThe CAG regimen is suitable for elderly patients and can be used for the treatment of relapsed refractory AML and secondary AML. The CAG regimen has mild non hematological adverse reactions. After chemotherapy, there is a longer bone marrow suppression period and a higher infection rate; The reason for the improved efficacy of CAG regimen in current patients may be related to the effective reduction of tumor burden during induction combined with target or immunotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
53.3%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
3
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
4
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
6
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
7
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
8
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
10
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
11
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
13
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Virologica Sinica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
16
Epigenomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
22
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%