Back

A single center cross-sectional study on the efficacy of low-dose cytarabine and aclramycin combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG regimen) in elder adults with acute myeloid leukemia

Xu, M.; He, C.; Wen, X.; Lan, C.; Li, X.; Hong, Y.; Li, X.

2024-11-19 hematology
10.1101/2024.11.18.24317527 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNowadays, the combination of CAG regimen with targeted therapy and immunotherapy has greatly improved the prognosis of AML patients, but there are controversies about the prognostic factors of CAG regimen alone, especially in AML elders. ObjectiveBy investigating the survival status of elder patients who received induction CAG regimen in our hospital at the beginning of this century and analyzing the factors affecting survival, we aim to provide scientific evidence for improving the survival of current patients. MethodThe AML elder patients treated with induction CAG regimen including low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 per 12 hours, day 1 to 14), aclarubicin(14 mg/m 2 per day, day 1 to 4), and G-CSF priming (200 ug / m2 per day, day 1 to 14) in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2001 to December 2009 were involved in this research. ResultsAmong 92 elderly AML patients, 44 (47.8%) showed clinical efficacy, while 48 (52.2%) experienced treatment failure (including 12 deaths (13.0%)). The main adverse reactions of chemotherapy were bone marrow suppression, with mild non hematological adverse reactions. The median recurrence time was 7 months. The risk factors related efficacy were high blasts, elevated LDH and HBDH. ConclusionThe CAG regimen is suitable for elderly patients and can be used for the treatment of relapsed refractory AML and secondary AML. The CAG regimen has mild non hematological adverse reactions. After chemotherapy, there is a longer bone marrow suppression period and a higher infection rate; The reason for the improved efficacy of CAG regimen in current patients may be related to the effective reduction of tumor burden during induction combined with target or immunotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.