Back

Low-dose calcium supplementation during pregnancy in low and middle-income countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Saronga, H. P.; Dwarkanath, P.; Cui, H.; Muhihi, A.; Kurpad, A. V.; Sri Poornima, V.; Sando, M. M.; Poornima, R.; Yelverton, C.; Masanja, H. M.; Sudfeld, C. R.; Pembe, A. B.; Fawzi, W. W.; Menzies, N. A.

2024-11-15 public and global health
10.1101/2024.11.14.24317327 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCalcium supplementation during pregnancy can reduce the risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth. Few countries have implemented WHO-recommended high-dose calcium supplementation (1500-2000mg/day), due to adherence and cost concerns. However, low-dose calcium supplementation (one 500mg tablet daily) has recently been shown to be similarly efficacious as high-dose supplementation. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of low-dose calcium supplementation during pregnancy, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with low dietary calcium intake. MethodsUsing a mathematical model, we estimated the lifetime health outcomes (cases, deaths and DALYs averted) and costs of low-dose calcium supplementation provided through routine antenatal care to women giving birth in 2024, as compared to no supplementation. We assessed costs (2022 USD) from a health system perspective, including cost-savings from averted care for preeclampsia and preterm birth. FindingsLow-dose calcium supplementation was estimated to prevent 1.3 (95% uncertainty interval: 0.2, 2.6) million preterm births (a 10% (2, 18) reduction), 1.8 (1.0, 2.8) million preeclampsia cases (a 23% (14, 32) reduction), as well as 5.9 (1.3, 12.9) million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Intervention costs would be $267 (220, 318) million and produce cost-savings of $56 (26, 86) million, with incremental costs per DALY averted of $90 (38, 389) across all countries, and a return on investment of 19.1 (3.8, 39.5). The intervention was cost-effective in 119 of 129 countries modeled when compared to setting-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds. While there was substantial uncertainty in several inputs, cost-effeciveness conclusions were robust to parameter uncertainty and alternative analytic assumptions. InterpretationLow-dose calcium supplementation provided during pregnancy is cost-effective for prevention of preeclampsia and preterm birth in most LMICs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.9%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
25
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%