Back

Characteristics of early career health researchers and experiences of burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada

Hewko, S.; Kowalec, K.; Anderson, L.; Mulvihill, E. E.; Aristizabal, M.; Ciernia, A. V.; Dhillon, S.; Dufour, A.; Lim, G. E.; Rousseaux, M.; Saleem, A.; Daraz, L.; Lam, G.; Association of Canadian Early Career Health Researchers,

2024-11-14 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2024.11.13.622718 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted research globally. How it impacted Canadian early-career health researchers (ECHRs) remains unclear. We administered a survey to understand the composition of ECHRs in Canada, their job experiences, and experiences of burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in May 2023 of Canadian ECHRs defined as within 7 years of their first independent research position. Quantitative analyses included a description of respondents by research pillar, socio-demographic and workplace characteristics, and the prevalence of burnout, disengagement or exhaustion. Sample characteristics were compared to national data on ECHRs from a Canadian funding agency. Thematic analysis of free-text responses was also conducted. ResultsA total of 225 respondents met the eligibility criteria. Most respondents were assistant professors and characteristics of our sample were like the national data. The COVID-19 pandemic posed many challenges to student recruitment, and emotional support of students, with over half of the respondents reporting a moderate to significant decline in mental health compared to pre-pandemic. A significant proportion of respondents were experiencing high burnout (62%, 95%CI:56-67%), exhaustion (64%, 95%CI: 57-70%) or disengagement (91%, 95%CI: 87-95%). Thematic analysis identified three themes: ongoing benefits/problems preceding the pandemic, unintended outcomes of strategies to manage/prevent/contain COVID-19, and reasons to stay in their current position. ConclusionsOur survey revealed that Canadian ECHRs reported many diverse challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and high burnout, putting the sustainability of this workforce at risk. Improved systems are needed to understand the long-term impacts and support the future of the Canadian health research ecosystem.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.6%
2
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
3
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
7
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
11
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%