Back

Bone Quality is Associated with Fragility Fracture in Patients with Hemoglobinopathies

Fung, E.; Sarsour, I.; Manzo, R.; Lal, A.

2024-11-13 hematology
10.1101/2024.11.12.24317185 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLow bone mass is common in adults with thalassemia (Thal) and sickle cell disease (SCD), though disease-specific artifacts may contribute to inaccuracies in bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. Trabecular bone score (TBS), an indicator of bone quality, is not susceptible to these challenges and may improve fracture risk prediction. MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted in patients with Thal or SCD who had at least one spine BMD scan by DXA performed in the past 10 years. The most recent scan was reanalyzed for bone quality using TBS Insight (Medimaps v 3.0.2) with abnormal defined as TBS <1.20. Fracture prevalence was determined by patient report with medical record validation. Patients were compared to healthy controls who participated in previous research. ResultsData was abstracted from 126 patients with Thal (31.7{+/-}11.9 yrs, 51% Male), 170 with SCD (24.6{+/-}13.5 yrs, 43% Male), and 64 controls (25.9{+/-}8.0 yrs, 17% Male). Low bone mass was observed in 63% of Thal compared with 36% of SCD and 3% of controls (p<0.001); while only 15% of patients had abnormal TBS. History of fracture was present in 35.6% of Thal and 22.9% of SCD; of which 15.7% were fragility fractures. After adjusting for age and hypogonadism, low bone mass was associated with an increased overall fracture prevalence (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.23; p=0.041), but not with fragility fracture. In contrast, abnormal bone quality was strongly associated with fragility fracture after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI (OR: 11.4, 95% CI: 2.2, 59.1, p=0.004). ConclusionsBone quality by TBS may be a valuable tool in predicting the risk of fragility fractures in young adults with hemoglobinopathies and should be considered when making decisions for anti-resorptive therapy in those with low BMD naive to fracture or where disease-specific artifacts complicate accurate spine assessment by BMD alone.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.6%
2
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.0%
3
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.8%
6
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
9
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
14
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%