MUSCLE: Muscle Understanding through Synthetic Computation and Lesion Evaluation A Semi-Synthetic Dataset for Hamstring Injury Prediction Using Electrical Impedance
Youssef Baby, L.; Shehayib, R.; Maalouf, N.
Show abstract
Hamstring Injuries (HSIs) are common among athletes and necessitate extended rehabilitation before Return to Sport (RTS). Post-injury, athletes undergo physical examinations, which often fall short in assessing injury severity or guiding rehabilitation. Therefore, imaging techniques such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are used to evaluate the injury more comprehensively, aiding in the assessment of optimal rehabilitation and RTS timelines. Given the significant impact of HSIs on athletic careers, early prediction is essential. This article investigates the use of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) for HSI prediction. EIT, a noninvasive method, involves injecting a current or voltage into the affected area to detect property changes, allowing for real-time monitoring and supporting its role in HSI prediction. A semi-synthetic dataset was created using MRI scans of patients with hamstring injuries. The dataset was developed by mapping the boundaries of the hamstring muscles (semimembranosus, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris) with Electrical Impedance Tomography and Diffuse Optical Tomography Reconstruction Software (EIDORS). EIDORS generated EIT voltage measurements by defining muscle boundaries and setting appropriate properties, forming the basis for the dataset. Machine Learning (ML) models were then employed to validate the dataset by distinguishing between injured and healthy hamstrings. The best-performing model, Random Forest (RF), achieved an accuracy of 98%, demonstrating the potential of EIT in predicting HSIs. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=122 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24317096v1_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@124532org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17cd6adorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f23838org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@48ec32_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1:C_FLOATNO Graphical Abstract C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Increase trajectories of tendon micro vibration intensity during ankle plantar flexion: A longitudinal data analysis using latent curve models 96%
- EEG in game user analysis: A framework for expertise classification during gameplay 96%
- Multi- Stage Feature Selection (MSFS) Algorithm for UWB- Based Early Breast Cancer Size Prediction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Visual Photoplethysmography Method 96%
- Legal Frameworks Upholding Deceased Individuals’ Rights and Enabling the Use of Cadavers in Anatomy Education and Research: A Systematic Review 90%
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving the Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among COVID-19 Patients 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification of Hyper-scale Multimodal Imaging Datasets 93%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 93%
- Automated Image Transcription for Perinatal Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Pain Recognition in Postoperative Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 94%
- A Study on Survival Scenario of COVID-19 patients in India: An Application of Survival Analysis on patient demographics 90%
- Developing a psychological support intervention to help injured athletes get Back in the Game 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of Three-Dimensional Chromatin Morphology for Nuclear Classification and Characterisation 95%
- Indexing Cerebrovascular Health Using Near-infrared Spectroscopy 94%
- Muscle activity of cutting manoeuvres and soccer inside passing suggests an increased groin injury risk during these movements 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.