Back

Fifteen-year Alcohol Consumption Trajectories and Their Association with Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: the Framingham Heart Study

Leng, Y.; Ding, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Lyu, C.; Levy, D.; Ma, J.; Liu, C.

2024-11-10 addiction medicine
10.1101/2024.11.09.24317038 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLong-term alcohol consumption patterns play a critical role in human health. ObjectivesWe aimed to identify alcohol consumption trajectories and analyze their associations with coronary heart disease (CHD) and all-cause mortality in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS). MethodsWe used a growth mixture model to identify sex-specific alcohol consumption trajectories over 15 years and Cox regression to examine associations of these trajectories with incident events that occurred during an additional 10-year follow-up, adjusting for covariates. ResultsWe identified four distinct trajectory groups among 6,570 participants (mean age 52; 55% women): Group 1 (n=2,713, reference) consisted of low-level drinkers; Group 2 (n=1,818) mainly included abstainers; Groups 3 (n=805) and 4 (n=1,234) comprised drinkers with varying patterns, with Group 4 consuming the most. Over 10 years of follow-up, women in Groups 2 to 4 had hazard ratios (HR) for CHD of 1.57 (95% CI = 1.11-2.22), 1.57 (95% CI = 1.08-2.29), and 1.27 (95% CI = 1.05-1.55) compared to Group 1. Women in Groups 2 (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.05-1.50) and 3 (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.05-1.55) also had higher all-cause mortality risks. Men in Group 2 had higher mortality (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.02-1.37, P = 0.030) and CHD (HR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.07-1.52, P = 0.001) risks compared to Group 1, while men in Group 4 had the highest mortality risk (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.02-1.37). ConclusionThis study identified four distinct alcohol consumption trajectories and demonstrated that maintaining low to moderate levels of alcohol drinking over time is likely associated with a lower risk of CHD and mortality in both women and men.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.