Back

Accurate Machine Learning Model for Human Embryo Morphokinetic Stage Detection

Misaghi, H.; Cree, L.; Knowlton, N.

2024-11-05 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2024.11.04.24316714
Show abstract

PurposeThe ability to detect, monitor, and precisely time the morphokinetic stages of human pre -implantation embryo development plays a critical role in assessing their viability and potential for successful implantation. Therefore, there is a need for accurate and accessible tools to analyse embryos. This work describes a highly accurate, machine learning model designed to predict 17 morphokinetic stages of pre-implantation human development, an improvement on existing models. This model provides a robust tool for researchers and clinicians, enabling the automation of morphokinetic stage prediction, standardising the process, and reducing subjectivity between clinics. MethodA computer vision model was built on a publicly available dataset for embryo Morphokinetic stage detection. The dataset contained 273,438 labelled images based on Embryoscope/+(C) embryo images. The dataset was split 70/10/20 into training/validation/test sets. Two different deep learning architectures were trained and tested, one using EfficientNet-V2-Large and the other using EfficientNet-V2-Large with the addition of fertilisation time as input. A new postprocessing algorithm was developed to reduce noise in the predictions of the deep learning model and detect the exact time of each morphokinetic stage change. ResultsThe proposed model reached an overall test accuracy of 87% across 17 morphokinetic stages on an independent test set. ConclusionThe proposed model shows a 17% accuracy improvement, compared to the best models on the same dataset. Therefore, our model can accurately detect morphokinetic stages in static embryo images as well as detecting the exact timings of stage changes in a complete time-lapse video.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 4%
16.0%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 29%
16.0%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Applied Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
7.9%
5
Human Reproduction
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 3%
4.7%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
8
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
9
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 24%
2.5%
10
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
14
IEEE Access
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.6%
15
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
16
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 17%
1.6%
17
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 10%
1.4%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 11%
1.4%
19
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
20
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
21
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
22
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
24
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Ophthalmology Science
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
26
European Radiology
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 19%
0.7%