Back

Deep learning-based embryo assessment of static images can reduce the time to live birth in in vitro fertilization

Yu, L.; Lam, K.; Ng, E.; Yeung, W.; Yu, L.; Lee, Y. L.; Huang, Y.

2024-10-29 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2024.10.28.24316259
Show abstract

The low success rate in in vitro fertilization (IVF) may be related to our inability to select embryos with good implantation potential by traditional morphology grading and remains a great challenge to clinical practice. Multiple deep learning-based methods have been introduced to improve embryo selection. However, existing methods only achieve limited prediction power and generally ignore the repeated embryo transfers from one stimulated IVF cycle. To improve the deep learning-based models, we introduce Embryo2live, which assesses the multifaceted qualities of embryos from static images taken under standard inverted microscope, primarily in vision transformer frameworks to integrate global features. We first demonstrated its superior performance in predicting Gardners blastocyst grades with up to 9% improvement from the best existing method. We further validated its high capability of supporting transfer learning using the large clinical dataset of the Centre. Remarkably, when applying Embryo2live to the clinical dataset for embryo prioritization, we found it improved the live birth rates of the Top 1 embryo in patients with multiple embryos available for transfer from 23.0% with conventional morphology grading to 71.3% using Embryo2live, reducing the average number of embryo transfers from 2.1 to 1.4 to attain a live birth.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 2%
17.5%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 44%
11.5%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Applied Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
Human Reproduction
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 16%
4.8%
7
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
4.6%
8
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 3%
4.6%
9
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
10
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 10%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
14
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 12%
1.2%
17
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
19
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Ophthalmology Science
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
21
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
22
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
24
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 14%
0.7%
25
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 6%
0.7%