The Role of Ethics in Physiotherapy: A Scoping Review Protocol
Bertoni, G.; Patuzzo Manzati, S.; Pagani, F.; Testa, M.; Battista, S.
Show abstract
Background and aimsEthical considerations play a crucial role in physiotherapy, influencing patient care, professional conduct, and clinical decision-making. Despite its significance, there is a limited comprehensive understanding of how ethical principles are applied in physiotherapy practice. The evolving nature of the field, alongside advancements in treatment approaches, presents new ethical challenges that require systematic investigation. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on ethical issues within physiotherapy, identify research methodologies, and highlight knowledge gaps. MethodThis review will follow the methodological framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for scoping reviews and will be reported following the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted on PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Central, and Pedro. The gray literature will be consulted. Studies involving physiotherapists and those addressing ethical issues in physiotherapy practice will be included. Data extraction will be based on a standardized form, and a narrative synthesis will categorize the ethical issues and principles. DiscussionThe review will provide a broad overview of ethical issues and principles in physiotherapy. It will inform future research priorities, guide ethical training for practitioners, and support the development of policies and guidelines to improve ethical shared decision-making in physiotherapy practice.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 96%
- Athletes’ access to, attitudes towards, and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing multimedia patient education materials for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of patient education videos 95%
- The role of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: an interview study 95%
- Postural control telerehabilitation with a low-cost virtual reality protocol for children with cerebral palsy: Protocol for a clinical trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 94%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 95%
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 95%
- Identifying barriers and facilitators to physical activity for people with scleroderma: A nominal group technique study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study 96%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
- Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review and critical appraisal 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.