Molecular Profiling of a Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cohort in India for EGFR and AR expression analyzed for patient outcomes showed a distinct subset of cellular co-expression
Vaid, P. M.; Puntambekar, A.; Kanse, P.; Kadu, S.; Agrawal, P.; Khatpe, A.; Banale, R.; Reddy, R.; Kelkar, D.; Hannenhalli, S.; Shashidhara, L.; Koppiker, C.; Kulkarni, M.
Show abstract
TNBC is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype, with a higher recurrence rate. TNBC proportion within breast cancer incidence in the Indian population is 22-30%. Despite the high incidence rate, the heterogeneity within TNBC subtype in Indian cohorts is not studied at scale. Here, leveraging an Indian cohort of 93 TNBC patients, we evaluated the basal and LAR subtypes in terms of the expression of known markers such as EGFR and AR and further assessed the association of marker gene expression with patient outcome and treatment response. In our cohort, 65% of the patients were EGFR-positive, 38% had positive AR expression, where both the subsets showed shorter disease-free survival outcomes. Additionally, 25% of the cohort showed AR and EGFR co-expression. Upon closer observation, using IHC and duplex staining, we noted that 15% of the tumors, in fact, had double-positive cancer cells, i.e., cellular co-expression of AR and EGFR. Patients with double-positive cells had poorer disease-free survival compared to the ones with the tissue-level co-expression of EGFR and AR but without cellular co-expression. The presence of EGFR+AR+ double-positive cells was further validated in publicly available single-cell data sets for TNBC patients from other ethnic backgrounds, albeit to a lesser extent than what was observed in our Indian cohort. Overall, our results highlight the heterogeneous nature of Indian TNBC tumors and provide further insight into ethnic variation in TNBC presentation that can be further exploited for precision and personalized targeted therapy.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer 96%
- The French Early Breast Cancer Cohort (FRESH): a resource for breast cancer research and evaluations of oncology practices based on the French National Healthcare System Database (SNDS) 95%
- Protein profiling of breast carcinomas reveals expression of immune-suppressive factors and signatures relevant to patient outcome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 96%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 95%
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering of HR+/HER2- breast cancer in an Asian cohort is driven by immune phenotypes 96%
- Lineage plasticity enables low-ER luminal tumors to evolve and gain basal-like traits 94%
- Targeting tumor-stromal interactions in triple-negative breast cancer using a human vascularized micro-tumor model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term patient-derived ovarian cancer organoids closely recapitulate tumor of origin and clinical response 95%
- ROLE OF cfDNA AND ctDNA TO IMPROVE THE RISK STRATIFICATION AND THE DISEASE FOLLOW-UP IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER: TOWARDS THE CLINICAL APPLICATION 94%
- Essential role of PLD2 in hypoxia-induced stemness and therapy resistance in ovarian tumors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational drug repositioning for the identification of new agents to sensitize drug-resistant breast tumors across treatments and receptor subtypes 94%
- ERK3/MAPK6 promotes triple-negative breast cancer progression through collective migration and EMT plasticity 93%
- Integrated molecular and pharmacological characterization of patient-derived xenografts from bladder and ureteral cancers identifies new potential therapies. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.