Data quality and Big Data in the health industry: a scoping review protocol
Tomaz Santos, L. C.; Bublitz, F. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionBig Data is characterized by the large volume of data, the variety of types and formats, the speed with which they are generated, and the veracity and value that can be extracted from the data. However, the result obtained with this technology will depend on the quality of the information obtained from the data. Big Data has great potential in healthcare and can be used to advance diagnosis, treatment, and healthcare management. Health data is highly vulnerable due to its sensitive nature, as it contains personal and confidential information. If exposed or compromised, it could lead to privacy violations, inaccuracies, misuse, incorrect diagnoses, or misguided decision-making in patient care. It is important to prioritize confidentiality, adhere to regulatory compliance, and maintain data integrity; for that, it is essential to use efficient methods to obtain quality data and make them able to reach the proposed objective. ObjectiveIn this context, the scoping review protocol aims to identify and map existing strategies, methods, or models that improve the quality of medical and health data in Big Data environments. This review explores the methods to support the effective use of Big Data in healthcare while addressing the challenges to maintain data integrity and ensure safe decision-making. Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be conducted based on the six-step process outlined in the framework proposed by Levac et al. in "Scoping Studies: Advancing the methodology" and will be reported following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The research team will use Data Quality, Big Data, and Health terms to search for primary studies in the Scopus Document Search, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, and ACM Digital Library databases.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- REPLICCAR II Study: Data Quality Audit in the Paulista Cardiovascular Surgery Registry 94%
- Common misconceptions held by health researchers when interpreting linear regression assumptions, a cross-sectional study 94%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 95%
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers 93%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review of the impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia 93%
- Data-driven discovery of changes in clinical code usage over time: a case-study on changes in cardiovascular disease recording in two English electronic health records databases (2001-2015) 93%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 92%
- The role of IT ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: an empirical study 92%
- Lessons learned from the resilience of Chinese hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.