Back

Building a model of sepsis: data integration unravels pathogenic mechanisms in severe P. aeruginosa infections.

Messina, F.; Rotondo, C.; Ladeira, L.; Properzi, M.; Dimartino, V.; Riccitelli, B.; Staumont, B.; Chillemi, G.; Geris, L.; Bocci, M. G.; Fontana, C.

2024-10-21 systems biology
10.1101/2024.10.17.618881 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding host-pathogen interactions is crucial for explaining the variability in sepsis outcomes, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) remaining a significant public health concern. In this work, we explored PA-human host interaction mechanisms through a data integration workflow, focusing on protein-protein and metabolite-protein interactions, along with pathway modulation in affected organs during severe infections. A scoping literature review enabled us to construct a domain-based infection network encompassing pathogenesis concepts, molecular interactions, and host response signatures, providing a wide view of the relevant mechanisms involved in severe bacterial infections. Our analysis yielded a literature-based comprehensive description of PA infection mechanisms and an annotated dataset of 189 PA-human interactions involving 152 proteins/molecules (109 human proteins, 3 human molecules, 34 PA proteins, and 5 PA molecules). This dataset was complemented with gene expression analysis from in vivo PA-infected lung samples. The results indicated a notable overexpression of proinflammatory pathways and PA-mediated modulation of host lung responses. Our comprehensive molecular network of PA infection represents a valuable tool for the understanding of severe bacterial infections and offers potential applications in predicting clinical phenotypes. Through this approach combining omics data, clinical information, and pathogen characteristics, we have provided a foundation for future research in host-pathogen interactions and the mechanistic grounds to build dynamic computational models for clinical phenotype predictions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.