Back

Optimisation of a cervical cancer screening model based on self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing

Beso Delgado, M.; Ibanez Cabanell, J.; Castan-Cameo, S.; Mira Solves, J. J.; Guilabert Mora, M.; Vanaclocha Espi, M.; Pinto Carbo, M.; Salas Trejo, D.; Llorens, O. Z.; Molina-Barcelo, A.

2024-10-17 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2024.10.16.24315599
Show abstract

The use of self-sampling devices in population-based cervical cancer screening programmes (CCSP) is both an opportunity and a challenge in terms of implementation. ObjectiveTo understand the expectations, preferences, and difficulties perceived by women as regards different screening models and self-sampling devices, with the aim of identifying strategies to achieve high CCSP participation rates. MethodsThis study is based on qualitative research techniques, consisting of an individual interview using a questionnaire with semi-structured questions, followed by a group interview. Sessions were held simultaneously with 4 groups (7-8 women aged between 35 and 65). Women assessed various aspects of the programme (information dissemination, invitation, receipt of results, etc.) and five self-sampling devices. ResultsIf screening were carried out via self-sampling, 96.4% of women said they would take the test. Most women preferred to receive information on the CCSP or return their samples at their health centres (86.2% and 86.2%), and the most popular method for receiving both the programme invitation and results is by SMS (58.6%, 65.5%). Simplicity and ease of use are the key features of the device accepted by the largest number of women, the FLOQSwab. Another highly rated feature is the attractive design of the Evalyn Brush, as this was the preferred device of the largest number of women. The existence of other screening programmes that use self-sampling devices (the colorectal cancer prevention programme) is an opportunity as regards acceptance of this new programme. Some women are unsure of how to use the devices correctly. A large number of women accept self-sampling and reveals significant differences in the degree of acceptance of different self-sampling devices. Selecting the most accepted device is key to achieving high CCSP participation rates, and these programmes should be accompanied by adapted information campaigns to reach the most vulnerable groups and ensure equity.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 16%
1.7× avg
2
Sexually Transmitted Infections
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 0.2%
95× avg
3
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 5%
7.1× avg
4
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 13%
2.4× avg
5
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
#1
95× avg
6
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 3%
7.2× avg
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 3%
7.1× avg
8
Vaccines
MDPI AG · based on 131 published papers
Top 2%
9.9× avg
9
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 4%
5.5× avg
10
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
11
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
Fortune Journals · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.2%
25× avg
12
Preventive Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
48× avg
13
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 14%
1.9× avg
14
BMJ Global Health
BMJ · based on 95 published papers
Top 9%
2.3× avg
15
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 82%
0.9%
16
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
5.8× avg
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 110 published papers
Top 19%
1.5× avg