Back

Study of Plasma Adiponectin Levels in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome and Therapeutic Indication in Bangladesh

Parul, S. S.; Ahmmed, R.; Hasan, M. T.; Islam, A.; Rahman, M. M.; Manirujjaman, M.; Bari, M. W.; Ahmed, M. S.; Hasan, M. S.; Islam, M. A.

2024-10-16 biochemistry
10.1101/2024.10.15.618480 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe metabolic syndrome (Met-S) is a cluster of some interrelated common clinical disorders, including central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and glucose intolerance. Central obesity, accompanied by insulin resistance, is a key factor for the development of metabolic syndrome. Adiponectin is an adipose-specific plasma protein, secreted from adipocyte with anti-atherogenic and insulin-sensitizing activities. PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the relationship of plasma adiponectin levels with metabolic syndrome, related disorders and its drug repurposing through in silico approach. Materials and MethodsFor this study, 269 individuals were recruited with written consent. The participants were selected based on their full medical history, clinical examination, and laboratory reports. Anthropometric measurements as well as blood pressure was measured before sample collection. Fasting blood samples were collected for the estimation of lipid profile, blood glucose, and serum adiponectin levels. ResultsOur results show that the adiponectin levels in the subjects with Met-S were significantly lower than those of without Met-S (p <0.0001). Among the metabolic syndrome risk factors, adiponectin levels were associated with hypertriglyceridemia and reduced HDL-cholesterol (p<0.0001). Three drugs (Saquinavir, Candesartan and Glimepiride) were suggested to control the plasma adiponectin level in the subjects with Met-S. ConclusionsSince the plasma adiponectin levels are significantly lower in patients with Met-S, it might be used as diagnostic & prognostic marker for Met-S disorder and adiponectin targeted drugs might be minimize the Met-S of the subjects.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.