Back

Joint effects of sleep duration and depression on the risk of cardiovascular disease and mediating role of depression in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: a nationwide prospective cohort study

Yu, S.; Chu, Y.

2024-10-16 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.10.14.24315497 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of mortality in China. Depression and sleep disturbances are recognized as risk factors for CVD, but their interplay and combined effects remain unclear. This study examines how sleep duration and depression interact to influence CVD risk. MethodsWe analyzed data from five waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) between 2011 and 2020. The final sample included 12,050 individuals aged 45 and above. Sleep duration was categorized as 6 hours or less, 6-8 hours and >8 hours. Depression was assessed using the CESD-10 score and categorized as no depression, mild/moderate depression, and severe depression. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the association between sleep, depression, and CVD. Mediation analysis explored depressions role in this relationship. ResultsShort sleep duration was associated with a higher CVD risk (HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03- 1.38). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis showed a U-shaped association between sleep duration and CVD risk, with the lowest risk observed at 7.61 hours of sleep. Severe depression further increased CVD risk when combined with short sleep duration (HR 2.08; 95% CI: 1.46-2.95) or long sleep duration (HR 2.08; 95% CI: 1.05-5.35). Mediation analysis revealed that depression explained 43.8% of the total effect of short sleep on CVD. ConclusionsBoth short sleep and depression independently raise the risk of CVD, with depression partially mediating the effect of sleep on cardiovascular health. Interventions targeting both sleep and mental health could reduce CVD risk in high-risk populations.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.