Factors associated with childhood obesity or overweight in children under five years old: a rapid review
Williams, J.; Bowles, C.; Needham-Taylor, A.; Jarrom, D.; Gillen, E. C.; Hounsome, J.; Davies, J.; Edwards, R. T. C.; Edwards, A. G.; Cooper, A.; Lewis, R.
Show abstract
Over one-quarter of children in Wales aged four-to-five live with overweight or obesity. Children with overweight or obesity may experience health issues during childhood or adolescence, or both. They are also more likely to have overweight or obesity through to adulthood. A wide range of biological (e.g. genetics), psychological, environmental (e.g. barriers to physical activity and access to healthier foods) and societal (e.g. lifestyle and peer influence) factors can potentially be associated with child overweight or obesity. Evidence reviews of factors associated with child overweight or obesity already exist, but these examine the influence of the above factors across a range of ages. No up-to-date review focuses specifically on factors associated with overweight or obesity when both the factor and its impact on weight status were studied in children under five years of age. We aimed to review existing reviews to identify the factors associated with overweight and obesity, specifically when impact on weight status was reported in children under five years of age. The review included evidence available up until December 2023, and 30 systematic reviews were identified. A wide range of biological, psychological, environmental and societal factors were consistently found to be associated with an increased risk of child overweight and/or obesity. Factors consistently found to be associated with a decreased risk of child overweight or obesity were breastfeeding and larger household size. Most of the high-certainty evidence related to child overweight. No high-certainty evidence was identified on the association between factors and child obesity specifically, and further research studies are needed. The high-certainty evidence supports helping women with overweight (who are thinking about having a baby or trying to conceive) to lose weight, reducing rapid weight gain during the first 12 months of life, providing opportunities for children of working mothers to access healthier foods and be more physically active. The moderate-certainty evidence supports promoting breastfeeding, reducing rapid weight gain during the first 13 months of life, monitoring the childs growth rate during the first two years of life (particularly for babies with catch-up growth), promoting baby-led weaning, reducing consumption of sugary drinks, and educating and supporting the wider caregivers to provide healthier foods and opportunities for play and physical activity. The findings from this review may differ from other reviews conducted to inform practice. This review only reports on overweight or obesity outcomes where they are measured before the age of five years, whereas previous reviews have measured these outcomes over a wider age range. This review also focusses on evidence that specifically classifies children as living with overweight or obesity using body mass index (or other well-accepted measures for children under two years). Funding statementThe authors and their Institutions were funded for this work by the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Parental and individual socioeconomic position show distinct associations with trajectories of diet quality across adolescence and early adulthood 93%
- Development of a parent-reported screening tool for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): Initial validation and prevalence in 4-7-year-old Japanese children 93%
- Evidence for a protein leverage effect on food intake but not on body mass index in a Norwegian population 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Eating Disorders In weight-related Therapy (EDIT): Protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of eating disorder risk in behavioural weight management 93%
- Shining light on Vitamin C Deficiency and Scurvy in Canada: A Scoping Review Protocol of Risk Profiles, Health Outcomes, and Interventions. 93%
- Concurrent of stunting and overweight/obesity among children: evidence from Ethiopia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preventing childhood obesity primary schools: a realist review from UK perspective 94%
- Relationship between early childhood non-parental childcare and diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep: A systematic review of longitudinal studies 93%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 95%
- Impacts of Global School Feeding Programmes on Children's Health and Wellbeing Outcomes: A Scoping Review 94%
- Transforming Obesity Prevention for CHILDren (TOPCHILD) Collaboration: protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of deprivation and neighbourhood food environments on home food environments, parental feeding practices, and child eating behaviours, food preferences and BMI: The Family Food Experience Study-London 94%
- Exploring the changing association between parental and adolescent fruit and vegetable intakes, from age 10 to 30 years 93%
- Calorie reformulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of manipulating food energy density on daily energy intake and body weight 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.