Religion, Politics, and Policy Related to Age-Adjusted Cancer, Heart Disease, Infant Mortality and COVID-19 Death Rates, U.S. States 2018-2021
Robertson, L. S.
Show abstract
The role of religion and politics in the responses to the coronavirus pandemic raises the question of their influence on the risk of other diseases. This study focuses on age-adjusted death rates of cancer, heart disease, and infant mortality per 1000 live births before the pandemic (2018-2019) and COVID-19 in 2020-2021. Eight hypothesized predictors of health effects were considered by examining their correlation to age-adjusted death rates and indicators of health behavior among U.S. states, percentage who pray once or more daily, Republican attitudes and influence on state health policies as indicated by the percentage vote for Trump in 2016, percent of household incomes below poverty, median family income divided by a cost-of-living index, the Gini income inequality index, urban concentration of the population, physicians per capita, and public health expenditures per capita. Since prayer for divine intervention is common to otherwise diverse religious beliefs and practices, the percentage of people claiming to pray daily in each state was used to indicate potential religious influence. Based on collinearity, inequality was chosen for inclusion over poverty, and the prayer and political variables were analyzed separately. All of the death rates were higher in states where more people claimed to pray daily. Only cancer and COVID-19 were correlated significantly with Trumps percentage of the vote. Lower death rates from cancer and heart disease are associated with more public health expenditures, but not for infant mortality or COVID-19 deaths. COVID-19 death rates were lower in states with more physicians per capita, but that variable was not significantly associated with the other death rates. Heart disease, infant mortality, and COVID-19 death rates were higher in states with more income inequality. All rates except infant mortality were lower in states where a greater percentage of the population resides in urban areas. The correlation between daily prayer and smoking cigarettes, as well as the neglect of public health recommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption and COVID-19 vaccination, suggests that reliance on prayer may be a factor in neglect of preventive practices.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of Elastic Net Regression for Modeling COVID-19 Sociodemographic Risk Factors 95%
- Effects of trust, risk perception, and health behavior on COVID-19 disease burden: Evidence from a multi-state US survey 93%
- Who is (Not) Complying with the Social Distancing Directive and Why? Testing a General Framework of Compliance with Multiple Measures of Social Distancing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Late surges in COVID-19 cases and varying transmission potential partially due to public health policy changes in 5 Western states, March 10, 2020-January 10, 2021 91%
- Disaster preparedness among women with a recent live birth in Hawaii, a cross-sectional study, results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2016 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Potential and Policy Changes in South Carolina, February 2020 – January 2021 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Influence of Public Health Faculty on College and University Plans during the COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
- Unequal Benefits: The Effects of Health Insurance Integration on Consumption Inequality in Rural China 92%
- How does public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors correlate in relation to COVID-19? A community-based cross-sectional study in Nepal 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 92%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 91%
- Effect of working from home on the association between job demands and psychological distress 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.