A European clinical practice guideline on pain, agitation, delirium, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome management in critically ill children: A protocol
MacDonald, I.; Cavin-Trombert, A.; Jaques, C.; Amigoni, A.; Ramelet, A.-S.; ESPNIC PaDIS consortium,
Show abstract
IntroductionIn pediatric intensive care units, pain, sedation, delirium, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome must be managed as interrelated conditions. Existing clinical practice guidelines have some methodological limitations and are not readily transferrable to the European context without adaptation. This protocol describes the methods for developing a high-quality, and the first patient- and family-informed European guideline for managing pain, sedation, delirium and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome. MethodsThe guideline will be developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) - ADOLOPEMENT approach, engaging clinical experts and patients and families in the development process. It will consist of seven phases: 1) Set-up - establishing three groups for guideline development: i) steering committee, ii) development panel (experts and patient/family partners from across Europe), and iii) patient and family advisory panel, and scoping to determine population, conditions, purpose, and users of the guideline; 2) Preparation - voting on summary recommendations, prioritizing research questions and outcomes, and matching research questions with existing recommendations; 3) Search and retrieval of evidence - using three search approaches to develop search strategies to find evidence, conducting individualized searches for each summary recommendation and new research question, selecting evidence, study appraisal, and initial data extraction; 4) Evidence synthesis - summarizing evidence in evidence profiles and summary of evidence tables, and conducting panel surveys of current practice when evidence is absent; 5) Development - drafting recommendations, voting on and approving them, and developing accompanying materials; 6) Review - conducting internal, society-level, and external international expert reviews; and 7) Issue - publishing the guideline. DiscussionThis protocol ensures a transparent process follows the GRADE approach for guideline development, leading to a high-quality, trustworthy, and credible guideline for managing pain, sedation, delirium and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in critically ill children. Tailored to the European context for healthcare professionals. Registration: Practice guideline REgistration for transPAREncy (PREPARE) registration number PREPARE-2024CN859
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 94%
- Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Symptomatic fever management in children A systematic review of national and international guidelines 94%
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Call For Better Methodological Quality Of Reviews On Using Artificial Intelligence For COVID-19 Detection In Medical Imaging – An Umbrella Systematic Review 94%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 92%
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 92%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.