Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) as a Biomarker of Acute Focal Brain Injury
Saez-Calveras, N.; Asturias, A.; Yu, J.; Stopschinski, B.; Vaquer-Alicea, J.; O'Suilleabhain, P.; Diamond, M. I.; Shah, B. R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe validation of acute brain injury biomarkers has encountered challenges such as the absence of pre-insult measurements, variability in injury timing and location, and interindividual differences. In this study, we addressed these limitations by using Magnetic Resonance-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU) thalamotomy to assess plasma biomarker changes after an acute focal brain injury. MethodsThis prospective study included 30 essential tremor (ET) and tremor-dominant Parkinsons disease (TDPD) patients undergoing MRgHIFU thalamotomy at a single academic institution. Blood samples were collected at three specific time points: pre-procedure, 1-hour post-procedure, and 48 hours post-procedure. Plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), amyloid-beta (A{beta}40 and A{beta}42), and phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau-181) were measured using the Quanterix Single Molecule Arrays (SiMoA) assay. ResultsGFAP levels significantly increased 48 hours post-MRgHIFU in all patients with a thalamotomy lesion. GFAP levels were highly sensitive (89.7%) and specific (96.6%) in detecting the presence of a HIFU lesion with a cutoff value of 216.2 pg/ml. NfL, A{beta}40, and A{beta}42, also showed statistically significant increases post-procedure but were less robust than GFAP. No changes were observed in pTau-181 levels post-MRgHIFU. ConclusionPlasma GFAP emerged as a highly sensitive and reliable biomarker for detecting acute brain injury following MRgHIFU thalamotomy. The significant post-procedure elevation of GFAP suggests its potential as an early diagnostic tool for focal brain injuries, particularly in acute stroke. Further research is needed to validate the GFAP injury cutoff identified in this study and to explore its broader clinical utility in the early detection of focal brain lesions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spinal cord MRI and MRS Detect Early-stage Alterations and Disease Progression in Friedreich Ataxia 93%
- Quantitative magnetisation transfer imaging in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Scaling behaviors of deep learning and linear algorithms for the prediction of stroke severity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Network fingerprint of stimulation induced speech impairment in essential tremor 91%
- RAN translation of C9orf72-related dipeptide repeat proteins in zebrafish recapitulates hallmarks of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and identifies hypothermia as a therapeutic strategy 91%
- MS-driven metabolic alterations are recapitulated in iPSC-derived astrocytes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors behind poor cognitive outcome following a thalamic stroke 93%
- Predictors of acute ischemic cerebral lesions in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome 92%
- Multifocal transient cortical brain lesions: a consistent MRI finding in neuro-COVID-19 patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal Assessment of Glymphatic Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from PVS burden and DTI-ALPS Imaging 93%
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 92%
- Towards individualized Medicine in Stroke – the TiMeS project: protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during and 3 months after endovascular treatment in large-vessel occlusion stroke 93%
- Interventional Neurorehabilitation for Promoting Functional Recovery Post-Craniotomy: A Proof-of-Concept 93%
- Early functional connectivity alterations in contralesional motor networks influence outcome after severe stroke 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.