Back

Determinants of Antibody Levels and Protection against Omicron BQ.1/XBB Breakthrough Infection

Martin Perez, C.; Ramirez-Morros, A.; Jimenez, A.; Vidal, M.; Pradenas, E.; Barrios, D.; Canyelles, M.; Rubio, R.; Cuamba, I.; Izquierdo, L.; Santamaria, P.; Trinite, B.; Vidal-Alaball, J.; Molinos-Albert, L.; Blanco, J.; Aguilar, R.; Ruiz-Comellas, A.; Moncunill, G.; Dobano, C.

2024-10-11 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.10.11.24315296 medRxiv
Show abstract

The ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2, particularly through the emergence of new variants, continues to challenge our understanding of immune protection. While antibody levels correlate with protection against earlier variants like Alpha and Delta, their relationship with Omicron sub-variants remains unclear. To investigate the role of antibody levels and neutralizing activity in preventing breakthrough infections, we analyzed longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses and neutralizing activity against the ancestral virus and major emerging variants in a well-characterized cohort of healthcare workers in Spain (N = 405). We found that antibody levels and neutralization titers are key indicators of protection against SARS-CoV-2, including the BQ.1 and XBB Omicron variants. Higher IgG and IgA levels were associated with protection over three 6-month follow-up periods sequentially dominated by BA.1, BA.2, BA.5, BQ.1, and XBB Omicron sub-variants, although the strength of the association between antibody levels and protection declined over time. Our findings demonstrate that binding antibody levels and neutralizing responses are a valid correlate of protection against more evasive BQ.1 and XBB Omicron variants, although the strength of this association declined over time. Additionally, our results underscore the importance of continuous monitoring and updating vaccination strategies to maintain effective protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.