Unveiling the latent dynamics in social cognition with multi-agent inverse reinforcement learning
Chen, Y.; Radulescu, A.; Wu, H. Z.
Show abstract
Understanding the intentions and beliefs of others, a phenomenon known as "theory of mind", is a crucial element in social behavior. These beliefs and perceptions are inherently subjective and latent, making them often unobservable for investigation. Social interactions further complicate the matter, as multiple agents can engage in recursive reasoning about each others strategies with increasing levels of cognitive hierarchy. While previous research has shown promise in understanding a single agents belief of values through inverse reinforcement learning, extending this to model interactions among multiple agents remains an open challenge due to the computational complexity. In this work, we adopted a probabilistic recursive modeling of cognitive levels and joint value decomposition to achieve efficient multi-agent inverse reinforcement learning (MAIRL). We validated our method using simulations of a cooperative foraging task. Our algorithm revealed both the ground truth goal-directed value function and agents beliefs about their counter-parts strategies. When applied to human behavior in a cooperative hallway task, our method identified meaningful goal maps that evolved with task proficiency and an interaction map that is related to key states in the task without accessing to the task rules. Similarly, in a non-cooperative task performed by monkeys, we identified mutual predictions that correlated with the animals social hierarchy, highlighting the behavioral relevance of the latent beliefs we uncovered. Together, our findings demonstrate that MAIRL offers a new framework for uncovering human or animal beliefs in social behavior, thereby illuminating previously opaque aspects of social cognition.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.