A systematic review to explore factors affecting participation in health research trials amongst underrepresented socio-economically disadvantaged populations in the UK and Ireland.
Brandon, J. L.; Bagnall, A. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThose with the greatest health inequalities and highest burden of poor-health have the lowest representation in health research. Meaning that diseases which are known to have higher prevalence in disadvantaged populations are being studied in healthier populations, so findings will be inappropriately applied to those that face the greatest challenges to their health. This systematic review is concerned with those defined as socioeconomic-deprived, gypsy/traveller/Roma communities, and homeless people. ObjectivesTo understand the barriers or facilitators to research participation in specific underserved groups to inform how equality, diversity and inclusion in research trials can be improved. MethodsA systematic review of etiology of quantitative and qualitative primary research conducted in the UK and Ireland in the previous 10 years, to produce a narrative synthesis of the themes identified. ResultsKey themes of barriers and facilitators were identified across the groups. All facilitators reported were common to all the groups. The value of peer-researchers, gatekeepers, community relationships and participatory approaches was a prominent feature within the facilitators. Reporting of barriers overall was lower, with fewer commonalities seen across the groups. The SE deprived group had the fewest barriers reported. ConclusionThe lack of identified barriers suggests that more work should be done to learn what these may be for specific groups, particularly in the SE deprived group. It seems likely that barriers exist in this group. The fact that these were not reported may indicate lack of reach to the most deprived sections of this population. Therefore, more research needs to be done to fully explore the barriers in the most deprived groups. By developing engagement approaches in a way which is tailored to separate underserved groups this will address barriers and help to shape the future of research.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of BAME community leaders 94%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- The impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lived experiences of people living in Thailand, Malaysia, Italy and the United Kingdom: a cross-country qualitative study 94%
- Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 94%
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges to self-isolation among contacts of cases of COVID-19: a national telephone survey in Wales 94%
- Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: A qualitative interview study 93%
- Social relationships and activities following elimination of SARS-CoV-2: a qualitative cross-sectional study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.