Unravelling the Impact of Tumor Location on Patient Survival in Glioblastoma: A Genomics and Radiomics Approach
Kundal, K.; Kumar, R.
Show abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain tumor, has a median survival rate of 12-15 months. Understanding the relationship between genetics and tumor location, as well as identifying non-invasive biomarkers, is crucial for improving treatment strategies and survival outcomes in GBM. In this study, we investigated the impact of tumor location on survival outcome of GBM patients along with genetic factors that influence tumor behaviour in different brain regions. Interestingly, we found that patients with parietal lobe tumors had significantly poor survival outcome compared to those with tumors in other brain regions, particularly the frontal lobe. In a comprehensive genomic analysis, we identified genetic factors, seemingly contributing to the poor survival outcomes in parietal lobe patients. We found the enrichment of PTEN loss-of-function mutations in parietal lobe tumors and interestingly these mutations are known to be associated with chemoresistance and poor patient survival. We also found two fusion genes i.e., FGFR3-TACC3 and EGFR-SEPT14, exclusively in parietal lobe tumors, which are known to play crucial roles in tumorigenesis. Differential gene expression analysis revealed the upregulation of genes like PITX2, HOXB13, and DTHD1, which could be responsible for tumor progression in parietal lobe tumors. Conversely, the downregulation of ALOX15 increased relapse risk. Copy number alterations, such as deletions in tumor suppressor gene (LINC00290), were linked to the aggressive nature of parietal lobe tumors. Radiomic analysis revealed two key features, lower LLL_GLDM_DependanceEntropy and higher HLL_firstorder_Mean, both of which show a significant correlation with increased risk and poorer survival outcome. These findings suggest the potential for targeted therapies and personalized treatments based on tumor location, genetic profile, and radiomic markers. We anticipate that as the size of the datasets will increase for radiogenomics based studies, it will further strengthen these findings and our understanding of molecular drivers for GBM progression, treatment resistance and survival outcome.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- LNX1 Modulates Notch1 Signaling to Promote Expansion of the Glioma Stem Cell Population During Temozolomide Therapy in Glioblastoma 94%
- Development of a Single Molecule Counting Assay to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cancer and Oncocytoma in Clinics 93%
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disrupting Akt-Wnt/β-catenin signaling suppresses glioblastoma stem cell growth and tumor progression in immunocompetent mice 94%
- Early Imaging Marker of Progressive Glioblastoma: a window of opportunity 91%
- Rapid DNA methylation-based classification of pediatric brain tumours from ultrasonic aspirate specimens 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of local microvascular proliferation in IDH wild-type Glioblastoma using relative Cerebral Blood Volume 95%
- A Large Scale Multi-dataset Investigation of Brain Metastases Distribution Based on Primary Cancer Type 94%
- Connecting Patterns of Tumor Growth with Sex Differences in Extreme Survivorship for Primary Glioblastoma Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional profiling of Multiple System Atrophy cerebellar tissue highlights differences between the parkinsonian and cerebellar sub-types of the disease 92%
- DNA methylation, combined with RNA sequencing, provide novel insight into molecular classification of chordomas and their microenvironment 92%
- Integrative analysis of DNA methylation suggests down-regulation of oncogenic pathways and reduced de-novo mutation in survival outliers of glioblastoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.