Back

Social Determinants of Health and Functional Brain Connectivity Predict Long-Term Physical Activity Adherence in Older Adults After a New Cardiovascular Diagnosis

Thovinakere, N.; Ghosh, S.; Itturia-Medina, Y.; Geddes, M.

2024-10-01 neurology
10.1101/2024.09.30.24314678 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPhysical activity is essential for preventing cognitive decline, stroke and dementia in older adults. A new cardiovascular diagnosis offers a critical window for positive lifestyle changes. However, sustaining physical activity behavior change remains challenging and the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. MethodsTo identify the neural, behavioral and contextual predictors of successful longer-term behavior change after a new cardiovascular diagnosis, we used support vector machine learning to predict changes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity over four years in 295 cognitively unimpaired older adults from the UK Biobank, testing three models that incorporated baseline: (i) demographic, cognitive, and contextual factors, (ii) baseline resting-state functional connectivity alone, and (iii) combined multimodal features across all predictors. ResultsThe combined multi-modal model had the highest predictive power (r=0.28, p=0.001). Key predictors included greenspace access, social support, retirement status, executive function, and between-network functional connectivity within the default mode, frontoparietal control and salience/ventral attention networks. ConclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of social and structural determinants of health and uncover neural mechanisms that may support lifestyle modifications. In addition to furthering our understanding of the mechanisms underlying successful physical activity behavior change, these findings help to guide the design of interventions and health policy with the ultimate goal of preventing cardiovascular disease burden and late-life cognitive decline.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.