The Impact of Pulmonary Fibrosis on Sex and Sexual Function, A Multinational Mixed Methods Study
Avitzur, N.; Knaub, M.; Thornton-Wood, F.; Johnson, S. R.; Ryerson, C. J.; Jenkins, R. G.; Stewart, I.; Johannson, K. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundSex is an important part of life for many adults, yet sexual function may be impacted by chronic respiratory diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis (PF). This multinational study sought to characterize the impact of PF on sex and sexual function, using mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology. MethodsPatients were retrospectively included from a prospective registry and prospective clinical cohort if they had completed UCSD-SOBQ or SPARC questionnaire, respectively. An online multi-lingual survey used the Changes in Sexual Function Questionnaire (CSFQ) to assess sexual dysfunction, and qualitative evaluation of individual patient interviews was conducted using thematic analysis. ResultsDyspnea with sexual activity affected 2,054/2,759 (74%) of registry patients, associated with male sex, lower FVC%, lower DLCO%, and worse cough. Distress due to the effect of PF on their sex life was reported in 52/225 (23%) of the clinical cohort, associated with younger age, male sex, lower DLCO%, and worse cough. Sexual dysfunction was common, affecting 56/67 (83%) of female and 63/73 (86%) male survey respondents. Qualitative analysis of patient interviews identified several themes including sex life limitations, changes in inter-personal relationships, quality of life, and emotions. All patients wanted to discuss sex with trusted healthcare providers. ConclusionIn this multinational study, patients with PF reported engaging in sex and sexual activities but were adversely impacted by the effect of PF on sex life, with both physical and psychological limitations. Sexual dysfunction was common, driven by multiple disease domains. Sexual health appears to be an important component of comprehensive patient care. FundingThe Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, but had no input on any aspect of this study.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-PCD – a participatory research study on the impact of COVID-19 in people with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia 92%
- Development and validation of a parent proxy bronchiectasis child quality of life instrument: The BC-QoL 92%
- COPD in the time of COVID-19: An analysis of acute exacerbations and reported behavioural changes in patients with COPD 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK wide survey 93%
- Monocyte and neutrophil levels are potentially linked to progression to IPF for patients with indeterminate UIP CT pattern 93%
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 93%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 92%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating CTHRC1 Levels are Associated with IPF Disease Severity and Survival 92%
- Optimised oxygenation improves functional capacity during daily activities in patients with COPD on long-term oxygen therapy – a randomised crossover trial 92%
- Long-Term Acceptability of Hygiene, Face Covering, and Social Distancing Interventions to Prevent Exacerbations in people living with Airways Diseases 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.