The Impact of Buoy on Hydration Status of Active Men and Women
Boyd-Shiwarski, C. R.; Ray, E. C.; Subramanian, H.; Zharichenko, N.; Monroe, A.; Mahajan, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundHypo-hydration is a major health concern that affects performance and is associated with increasing morbidity and growing health care costs. There is an emerging interest in optimum hydration and identifying how factors such as ingestion rate and beverage composition affect hydration. This study examined three beverages with varying ingestion rates and measured markers of hydration. MethodsThirty healthy, active participants between ages 18-45 years were given three different beverages on three separate days. The beverages were of identical volumes (1 Liter), but differed in the rate of ingestion, carbohydrate content and electrolyte content. Beverage 1 (Buoy, San Diego, CA) and water-alone were both consumed at a metered rate of one liter over four hours, whereas Beverage 2 was used as a positive control and consumed at a bolus rate of one liter in 30 minutes. FindingsAfter six hours Beverage 1 significantly improved markers of hydration compared to water-alone or Beverage 2. Beverage 1 decreased cumulative urine output vs water-alone by 32% (absolute difference -0.33L; CI {+/-} -0.16 to -0.51) and vs Beverage 2 by 26% (absolute difference - 0.26L; CI {+/-} -0.13 to -0.38). Beverage 1 increased the beverage hydration index vs water-alone by 64% (absolute difference +0.64L; CI {+/-} 0.36 to 0.92) and vs Beverage 2 by 48% (absolute difference +0.53L; CI {+/-} 0.30 to 0.76) InterpretationBeverage 1 is superior to water-alone at improving hydration when ingested at similar rates. Moreover, metered ingestion of Beverage 1 improved hydration compared to a bolus ingestion of Beverage 2, this could be due to the dissimilar ingestion rates and/or beverage composition. RESEARCH IN CONTEXTDespite the overwhelming number of commercial hydration beverages on the market, there are only a very limited number of studies that address whether these beverages are actually effective at improving hydration. Using PubMed and Google Scholar using the search term "Beverage Hydration Index" with the search date from 2016-2024 (2016 was when the Beverage Hydration Index was established) we found less than 10 articles on this topic that used the beverage hydration index to assess the efficacy of popular beverages and supplements, and none of them have previously evaluated the efficacy of Beverage 1 (Buoy). Additionally, only one other study assessed how that rate of beverage ingestion can influence the beverage hydration index. This current study has found Beverage 1 increased the beverage hydration index vs water-alone by 64% (absolute difference +0.64L; CI {+/-} 0.36 to 0.92). We propose that Beverage 1 increases the beverage hydration index due to its abundance of electrolytes including sodium and chloride, as it does not contain carbohydrates, protein, or artificial sweeteners that are common in other commercial hydration beverages. Identifying beverages that improve hydration compared to water-alone can play an important role in preventing severe hypohydration and dehydration, including renal failure, seizures, arrythmia, and altered mental status. It has been estimated that over half a million hospitalizations per year are due to dehydration with a cost of over 5.5 billion United States dollars(1). Thus, there are both clinical and economic reasons to identify simple, cost-effective methods to promote euhydration.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sodium content of menu items in New York City chain restaurants following enforcement of the sodium warning icon rule, 2015-2017 94%
- The time to peak blood bicarbonate (HCO3-), pH, and strong ion difference (SID) following sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) ingestion in highly trained adolescent swimmers 94%
- Dynamic analysis of the individual patterns of intakes, voids, and bladder sensations reported in bladder diaries collected in the LURN study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and Safety of Habitual Consumption of a Food Supplement Containing Miraculin in Malnourished Cancer Patients: the CLINMIR Pilot Study 93%
- Differences in Dietary Intake Exist Among U.S. Adults by Diabetic Status Using NHANES 2009-2016 92%
- Oral bioavailability and metabolism of hydroxytyrosol from food supplements 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher energy requirement during weight-loss maintenance on a low- versus high-carbohydrate diet: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled feeding study 91%
- Assessing sustainable and healthy diets in large-scale surveys: validity and applicability of a dietary index based on a brief food group propensity questionnaire representing the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet 90%
- Fecal metagenomics to identify biomarkers of food intake in healthy adults: Findings from randomized, controlled, nutrition trials 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An extract of hops ( Humulus lupulus L.) modulates gut peptide hormone secretion and reduces energy intake in healthy weight men: a randomised, cross-over clinical trial 92%
- Monitoring Body Composition Change for Intervention Studies with Advancing 3D Optical Imaging Technology in Comparison to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry 89%
- Long-term dietary intervention reveals resilience of the gut microbiota despite changes in diet and weight 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.