Characterization of motor function recovery using muscle synergies in stroke patients undergoing upper limb rehabilitation
Pregnolato, G.; Severini, G.; Maistrello, L.; Rimini, D.; Lencioni, T.; Carpinella, I.; Ferrarin, M.; Jonsdottir, J.; Cheung, V. C. K.; Turolla, A.
Show abstract
In stroke rehabilitation, muscle synergies have been investigated to provide information on the level of upper limb motor impairment, but not yet for explaining motor recovery after therapy. In this study, we analysed muscle synergies parameters extracted from 62 people with stroke who underwent a specific upper limb treatment (20 sessions, 1h/day, 5d/week, 4 weeks) consisting of virtual reality, robotic or conventional treatment. Overall, participants improved upper limb motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity-FMA-UE: {Delta}= 7.14 {+/-} 7.46, p< 0.001) but the number of muscle synergies of the impaired side (N-aff) did not change after treatment (N-aff: T0= 8.8 {+/-} 1.5; T1=8.7 {+/-} 1.4; p=0.374). Then, we stratified the sample into Responder (No.=34) and Non-Responder (No.=28) participants, based on the Minimal Clinical Important Difference value of FMA-UE ({Delta} >5 points). We investigated merging and fractionation indexes in both subgroups and only the Responder subgroup significantly decreased the percentage of merged muscle synergies (p=0.004). No significant changes in the fractionation index resulted in either subgroup. Finally, we identified vocabularies of affected upper limb motor synergies, before (No. 13 synergies) and after treatment (No. 14 synergies), and in unaffected upper limb (No. 16 synergies). We identified upper limb motor functions associated with each muscle synergy in each vocabulary based on the muscles represented in the muscle synergy. There were no differences in motor functions characterizing Responder patients. However, after therapy, both Responder and Non-Responder subgroups were characterized by the same distribution of motor functions across muscle synergies observed in the unaffected limb. Trial registrationThe trial is registered in ClinicalTrial.gov, identifier number NCT03530358 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03530358). Key messagesO_LIRehabilitation therapy for the upper limb induces reduction of muscle synergies merging in people with stroke expressing clinically important improvement of motor function. This muscular pattern is in accordance with motor control mechanisms underpinning functional recovery. C_LIO_LIMotor function of the affected upper limb at baseline did not characterize the muscular profile of patients responding to rehabilitation treatment (Responder). C_LIO_LIAfter therapy, all patients regardless the amount of motor function improvement (i.e., Responder, Non-Responder) express a muscular profile of the affected upper limb like the unaffected upper limb. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 95%
- Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability and Muscle Synergies During Complex Locomotor Task in Individuals With and Without Cerebral Palsy: A TMS and EMG Study 95%
- Towards individualized Medicine in Stroke – the TiMeS project: protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Technology-aided assessment of functionally relevant sensorimotor impairments in arm and hand of post-stroke individuals 96%
- Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke 94%
- Speed-dependent biomechanical changes vary across individual gait metrics post-stroke relative to neurotypical adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of combining constraint-induced movement therapy and action-observation training on upper limb kinematics in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. 93%
- Tactile versus Motor Imagery: Differences in Corticospinal Excitability Assessed with single-pulse TMS 93%
- Proprioceptive and visual motion detection acuity contribute to children dynamic postural control 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.