Back

Olfactory Bulb Volume and Asymmetry as Predictors of Executive Dysfunction in Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease

Racki, A.; Shah, A.; Slabicki, R.; Wallace, J.; Lee, V. K.; Ceschin, R.

2024-09-24 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.09.24.24314159 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeCommon sequelae for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are neurodevelopmental disabilities including executive function, attention, and socio-emotional deficits. Although these are common diagnoses for patients with CHD, limited research has investigated the mechanistic underpinnings of these findings. Our previous research examined the association between abnormal respiratory ciliary motion and brain abnormalities in infants with CHD. Results suggested that abnormal ciliary motion correlated to a spectrum of subtle dysplasia, notably within the olfactory bulb (OB)1. Our current study investigates whether OB anomalies predict neurodevelopmental outcomes for pediatric patients with CHD. We hypothesize that adolescents with CHD who exhibit aberrant morphological measurements in the OB are more likely to suffer from executive functional deficits. Materials and MethodsA prospective, observational study of 54 CHD and 75 healthy subjects, ages 6-25 years old, was completed under the supervision of a senior pediatric neuroradiologist. T2 3D Space and T2 Blade 2MM MRI images were manually segmented to extract volumetric bilateral regions of the OB and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using ITK-SNAP. Imaging metrics were correlated to OB asymmetry, CSF to OB ratio, total CSF volume, total OB volume, and independent left and right CSF and OB volumes. Linear regression was used to evaluate MRI morphologic measurements with co-variates: CHD status, sex, MRI age, and segmenter. Executive function was determined by the Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Parent Report and Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) for subjects ages 6-16. Cognition and olfactory function were measured with the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery and Odor Identification Test, respectively. ResultsNo statistically significant results were reported between cohorts for asymmetry of OB, CSF to OB ratio, total CSF volume, total OB volume, nor between independent left and right CSF and OB volumes. Increased OB volume was associated with worse outcomes on the BRIEF Parent Report (p[≤]0.03). Asymmetry of OB predicted poorer executive functioning as reported by parents on the BRIEF (p[≤]0.05). Overall, the CHD cohort demonstrated worse scores on the BRIEF Parent Report compared to controls. Across groups, no significant association was reported for olfaction function measured by the NIH Toolbox Odor Identification Test on a limited subset of participants. ConclusionAs survival rates for CHD improve, there is an increased risk of long-term neurodevelopmental impairments. Our findings identify adolescents who are at risk for executive dysfunction, particularly those showing increased OB volume and/or asymmetry of the OB. This is particularly concerning for the CHD population with atypical OB morphology, who also exhibit significantly poorer outcomes on the BRIEF Parent Report and face a higher overall risk. Increased OB volume and OB asymmetry are olfactory-based biomarkers that may help identify at-risk CHD patients earlier, enabling more timely intervention and support.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
8
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
16
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
22
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%