A curated collection of transcriptome datasets to study the transcriptional response in blood and nasal samples following viral respiratory inoculation and vaccination
Lan, Z.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, P.; Tang, M.; Fu, M.; Hagood, J. S.; Pickles, R. J.; Zou, F.; Zheng, X.
Show abstract
Our understanding of the human immune systems response to viral respiratory tract infections (VRTIs) and vaccines, including the molecular mechanisms and correlates of protection, remains incomplete. Extensive transcriptomic data from inoculation and vaccination studies have been deposited in publicly available databases. However, these studies are often separate and difficult to locate. We provide a curated compendium of public gene expression data repositories for researchers to reanalyze transcriptomes from human whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and nasal swab samples. This enables the study of transcriptional responses to viral inoculation or vaccination. This collection includes 18 datasets from inoculation studies and 37 datasets from vaccination studies, sourced from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), ImmPort Shared Data, and ArrayExpress.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Immune Signatures Data Resource: A compendium of systems vaccinology datasets 91%
- A structured course of disease dataset with contact tracing information in Taiwan for COVID-19 modelling 89%
- Integrated cancer cell-specific single-cell RNA-seq datasets of immune checkpoint blockade-treated patients 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive mapping of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants induced by natural infection or vaccination 93%
- Immunogenicity of a third dose of BNT162b2 to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 & Omicron variant in adults who received two doses of inactivated vaccine 92%
- Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccines in the HIVE household cohort over 8 years: is there evidence of indirect protection? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.