Effect of different lining paper materials and infusions on oviposition preference of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) gravid mosquitoes
Momen, M.; Seheli, K.; Hossain, M. A.; Ghosh, A.; Hossain, M. F.
Show abstract
Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) mosquito is a vector, responsible for increasing global public health concerns due to its rapid geographical spread and increasing vectorial capacity. Understanding the breeding behavior of Ae. aegypti is crucial to control this vector and thereby limiting the spread of diseases. To study this mosquito breeding in the laboratories and ovitraps, different types of lining-papers, surrounding inner surface of a container along with different types of added infusions, are used. Lining-papers serve as surfaces for oviposition and infusions provide the essential environment for nurturing. The types of oviposition surfaces and infusions used in laboratory rearing facilities or ovitraps influence oviposition preference, changing the breeding behavior of Ae. aegypti gravid mosquitoes. This study presents a comparative study on oviposition preferences for six different types of lining-papers and six different types of infusions in a bioassay cage. ANOVA analysis shows a significant effect on oviposition preference of different types of lining-papers that served as oviposition surfaces. The highest oviposition activity was observed for the agri seed germination paper-75 lining-paper when normal tap water infusion was used. Likewise, statistical analysis shows that when a plain printing offset paper 80 GSM lining-paper was used, a highly statistically significant effect on oviposition preference is observed for different types of infusions used in the oviposition cups.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Laboratory testing of very low-copper-treated water to prolong pupation and emerging time of mosquito larvae: an alternative method to delay mosquito breeding capability 97%
- Impact of Sugar-Based Baits on Midgut Microbiome Composition in Aedes Mosquitoes: Implications for Vector Control 97%
- Effects of antennal segments defects on blood-sucking behavior in Aedes albopictus 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aedes albopictus (Skuse) susceptibility status to agrochemical-insecticides used in durian planting systems in southern Thailand 96%
- Expansive and diverse phenotypic landscape of field Aedes aegypti larvae with differential susceptibility to temephos: beyond metabolic detoxification 94%
- Emerging mosquito resistance to piperonyl butoxide-synergized pyrethroid insecticide and its mechanism 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Infection of highly insecticide-resistant malaria vector Anopheles coluzzii with an environmentally friendly entomopathogenic bacteria Chromobacterium violaceum reduces its survival, blood feeding propensity and fecundity 95%
- Societal Uses of the Main Water Bodies Inhabited by Malaria Vectors and Implications for Larval Source Management 94%
- Characterizing the molecular and metabolic mechanisms of insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Faranah, Guinea 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ingested insecticide to control Aedes aegypti: Developing a novel dried attractive toxic sugar bait device for intra-domiciliary control 96%
- An assessment of adult mosquito collection techniques for studying species abundance and diversity in Maferinyah, Guinea 96%
- Insecticide resistance status of Aedes aegypti in Bangladesh 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Cymbopogon flexuosus (Poaceae) essential oil and primary components on the eclosion and larval development of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) 96%
- Essential oils of plants and their combinations as an alternative adulticides against Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) populations. 96%
- Sugar-feeding by invasive mosquito species on ornamental and wild plants 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.