Closing the gaps: testing the efficacy of carbapenem and cephalosporins in treating late-stage anthrax
Sittner, A.; Bar-David, E.; Glinert, I.; Ben-Smueal, A.; Schlomovitz, J.; Levy, H.; Weiss, S.
Show abstract
Anthrax is a fatal zoonotic disease caused by exposure to Bacillus anthracis spores. Treatment of systemic anthrax is usually efficient when using the right antibiotics as close as possible to exposure, preferably prior to symptoms onset as post exposure prophylaxis (PEP). The efficacy decreases as treatment is initiated later in disease progression. The CDC in its guidelines divides anthrax treatment to three different indications according to the progression of the disease: PEP, systemic and systemic with indications of CNS infection. While the prognosis of PEP or early treatment of systemic anthrax is very good, ingress of the bacteria into the CNS significantly decreases treatment efficacy, creating a substantial clinical challenge. Since anthrax in humans is rare, the CDC recommendations are mainly based on animal model experiments and data obtained from patients infected with other pathogens. Here we use rabbits to test the efficacy of the combined treatment of Meropenem and Doxycycline which is the first choice in the CDC recommendations for treating systemic patients with indication of CNS infection. In addition, we test the efficacy of the first-generation cephalosporin, cefazolin, in treating the different stages of the disease. We found that the combination of Doxycycline and Meropenem is highly effective in treating rabbits in our inhalation and CNS infection models. Cefazoline was efficient only as PEP or systemic stage treatment but not CNS infected animals. Our findings support the CDC recommendation of using a combination of Doxycycline and Meropenem for systemic patients with or without indications for CNS infection. We found that Cefazoline is a decent choice for PEP or early sage systemic disease but recommend considering using this antibiotic only if all other options are not available.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Q203 containing fully intermittent oral regimens exhibited high sterilizing activity against Mycobacterium ulcerans in mice 96%
- In Vitro Evidence to Support Amphotericin B and Flucytosine Combination Therapy for Talaromycosis 95%
- Molecular Epidemiology and Microbiological Characteristics of Cryptococcus gattii VGII isolates from China 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distribution, Prevalence of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Hainan Island and Antibiotic Resistance of Mycobacterium abscessus 93%
- Evaluating mono and combination therapy of meropenem and amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model 93%
- Differential growth rates and in vitro drug susceptibility to currently used drugs for multiple isolates of Naegleria fowleri 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- In vitro and in vivo activity of Gepotidacin against drug-resistant mycobacterial infections 94%
- Susceptibility trends of zoliflodacin against multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae clinical isolates in NanJing, China (2014-2018) 94%
- Fenbendazole controls in vitro growth, virulence potential and animal infection in the Cryptococcusmodel 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the relationship between Pathogenic Potential and Infective Inoculum 92%
- Determining Aspergillus fumigatus transcription factor expression and function during invasion of the mammalian lung 92%
- The fungal expel of 5-fluorocytosine derived fluoropyrimidines mitigates its antifungal activity and generates a cytotoxic environment 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.