Back

Genome-wide Association Study of Social Isolation in 63 497 Japanese Individuals from the General Population

Ohseto, H.; Inoue, K.; Takahashi, I.; Obara, T.; Narita, A.; Ishikuro, M.; Orui, M.; Murakami, K.; Noda, A.; Shinoda, G.; Takase, M.; Nakaya, N.; Kogure, M.; Hatanaka, R.; Nakaya, K.; Chiba, I.; Tokioka, S.; Kotozaki, Y.; Shimizu, A.; Tanno, K.; Hozawa, A.; Tamiya, G.; Kondo, N.; Kuriyama, S.

2024-09-23 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.09.21.24314109 medRxiv
Show abstract

Social isolation, characterized by a lack of social connections with family, friends, and others, is associated with adverse health outcomes. However, the genetic contribution to the susceptibility to social isolation remains unclear. This study aimed to identify genetic loci associated with social isolation using the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6) in a Japanese population. The Tohoku Medical Megabank Community-Based Cohort Study was conducted between 2013 and 2016. The participants were genotyped using the Affymetrix Axiom Japonica Array. The LSNS-6 was used to assess familial and friend ties through six questions and social isolation statuses were defined as total scale, family subscale, and friend subscale. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) were conducted using a generalized linear mixed model, adjusting for age, sex, and 10 genetic principal components. In total, 63 497 participants who completed genotyping and the LSNS-6 were included. The mean age was 59.4{+/-}11.9 years, and 41 126 (64.8%) were female. Significant genetic loci were identified in GWASs for the total scale (rs10736933 near ACADSB and HMX3) and friend subscale of LSNS-6 (rs1778366 near LINC02315 and LRFN5). This study provides the first genome-wide evidence of social isolation in the Japanese population, suggesting associations with ACADSB, HMX3, LINC02315, and LRFN5. These findings could enable personalized prevention and intervention for social isolation and related psychiatric disorders.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.