Back

Molecular Characterization of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia via Integrative Transcriptomics: A Multicenter Study in Argentina

Ruiz, M. S.; Abbate, M. M.; Sosa, E.; Avendano, D.; Mercado, I. G.; Lacreu, M. L.; Riccheri, M. C.; Schuttenberg, V.; Aversa, L.; Vazquez, E.; Gueron, G.; Cotignola, J.

2024-09-22 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.09.19.24313988 medRxiv
Show abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer worldwide, and exhibits high molecular heterogeneity. Molecular subtypes are characterized by specific chromosomal and molecular alterations, which are critical for guiding risk-adapted therapies. However, the increasing number of recognized prognostic molecular subtypes demands large resources, which are often limited in low/middle-income countries; thereby restricting the molecular characterization. This study aimed to perform an integrated molecular characterization of childhood B-ALL in Argentine patients. We performed RNA-seq on diagnostic bone marrow aspirates from Argentine patients enrolled in the ALLIC-GATLA-2010 protocol. We used different bioinformatic tools to identify and validate single nucleotide variants, fusion transcripts, gene expression profiles and molecular subtypes. We successfully determined transcriptome-based molecular subtype in 93.7% of patients; with high concordance to conventional karyotyping and RT-PCR (17/18 patients with available molecular data). Analysis of chimeric transcripts revealed 82 fusions, both intra- and inter-chromosomal, suggesting that leukemic cells may undergo chromosomal instability. Two of these fusions were novel: SCAF8::FER1L4 and DBF4B::EFTUD2. We also identified 21 different SNVs/InDels in 16 genes, including three novel variants (DUX4 p.I65N, CREBBP p.G1542V, and CSF3R p.G147R) and predicted to alter protein function. Overall, we observed that all patients who relapsed carried high-risk genetic alterations at diagnosis. Whole-transcriptome analysis of leukemic bone marrow enabled molecular subtyping and the identification of both known and novel molecular alterations associated with prognosis.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.1%
2
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Immunology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
15
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
21
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
23
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
24
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
26
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
27
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%