Back

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in gallbladder cancer

Zhou, H.; Zhang, P.; Sun, C.; Ge, Z.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Lin, S.; Wu, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, S.; Li, X.; Li, W.; Lai, Y.

2024-10-16 oncology
10.1101/2024.09.18.24313930 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGallbladder cancer is a grave threat to human health and poses a severe economic burden. Enhanced CT is extensively used in the diagnosis of gallbladder tumors. However, false-positive results on enhanced CT can lead to misdiagnosis and incorrect surgery or treatment, while false-negative results on enhanced CT can lead to missed diagnosis and delayed treatment. There is an urgency to find convenient, cost-effective and noninvasive diagnostic methods to decrease the false-positive and false-negative rates of gallbladder-enhanced CT. The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D in gallbladder cancer. Patients and methodsFifty study subjects (malignant group, n=12; benign group, n=38 cases) were finally recruited in the study. Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit (YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit) to assess the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D, respectively. ResultsThe sensitivity of YiDiXie SS was 100% (95% CI: 75.8% - 100%) and its specificity was 65.8% (95% CI: 49.9% - 78.8%). This means that YiDiXie SS has very high sensitivity and high specificity in gallbladder tumors.The sensitivity of YiDiXie-HS was 83.3% (95% CI: 55.2% - 97.0%) and its specificity was 84.2% (95% CI: 69.6% - 92.6%). This means that YiDiXie-HS has high sensitivity and high specificity in gallbladder tumors.The sensitivity of YiDiXie-D was 66.7% (95% CI: 39.1% - 86.2%) and its specificity was 92.1% (95% CI: 79.2% - 97.3%). This means that YiDiXie -D has high sensitivity and very high specificity in gallbladder tumors. The sensitivity of YiDiXie-SS in patients with positive enhanced CT was 100% (95% CI: 64.6% - 100%), and its specificity was 60.0% (95% CI: 31.3% - 83.2%). It implies that the application of YiDiXie-SS reduces the false-positive rate of gallbladder-enhanced CT by 60.0% (95% CI: 31.3% - 83.2%) without essentially increasing the leakage of malignancies. The sensitivity of YiDiXie-HS in enhanced CT-negative patients was 80.0% (95% CI: 37.6% - 99.0%) and its specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 68.5% - 94.3%). It implies that the application of YiDiXie -HS lowers the false-negative rate of enhanced CT by 80.0% (95% CI: 37.6% - 99.0%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie-D in patients with positive enhanced CT was 71.4%(95% CI: 35.9% -94.9%) and its specificity was 90.0%(95% CI: 59.6% - 99.5%). It implies that YiDiXie-SS lowers the false-positive rate of enhanced CT for 90.0%(95% CI: 59.6% - 99.5%). YiDiXie-D has a sensitivity of 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% - 92.9%) in patients with negative enhanced CT and its specificity is 92.9% (95% CI: 77.4% - 98.7%). This means that YiDiXie-D reduces the false-negative rate of enhanced CT by 60.0% (95% CI: 23.1% - 92.9%) while maintaining high specificity. ConclusionYiDiXie -SS has very high sensitivity and high specificity in gallbladder tumors.YiDiXie -HS has high sensitivity and high specificity in gallbladder tumors.YiDiXie -D has high sensitivity and very high specificity in gallbladder tumors.YiDiXie -SS significantly reduced gallbladder enhanced CT false-positive rates with essentially no increase in delayed treatment for gallbladder cancer. YiDiXie -HS significantly reduces the false-negative rate of gallbladder enhanced CT. YiDiXie -D can significantly reduce the false-positive rate of gallbladder enhanced CT, or significantly reduce the false-negative rate of gallbladder enhanced CT while maintaining a high level of specificity. Clinical trial numberChiCTR2200066840.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.